The 9-11 Cover Up Ends: July 9, 2008
552clocker bob wrote:WTC7 partially evacuated, huge explosions and damage, corpses strewn across parts of the building. All before either Twin Tower was demolished.
i watched the video.
WTC7 Partially evacuated = true
Huge Explosions and Damage = true
Corpses..."before either Twin Tower" = not true
according to the guy's story, he reached the main floor (where he is told not to "look down" as he was walking over bodies) AFTER the towers collapsed.
i find it bizzare that somebody would be so shocked to see the main floor of a building absolutely destroyed when one of the largest structures in the world, right next door, just collapsed.
july 10th, 2008 - a day after the 9/11 conspiracy was exposed
LingLing - www.myspace.com/linglingchicago
The 9-11 Cover Up Ends: July 9, 2008
553data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/124a0/124a057fa536d8b2a35bf3afffaf99f510849573" alt="Image"
Thats some pretty serious damage to the bottom corner of the building.
The 9-11 Cover Up Ends: July 9, 2008
554Rick Reuben wrote:Are you pointing out that a building that had corner damage should have begun leaning towards the damage, rather than doing what it did: fall evenly straight down, mimicing a controlled demolition?Heeby Jeeby wrote:Thats some pretty serious damage to the bottom corner of the building.
If so- great point.
I don't know. I don't have any formal training in structural engineering. I would guess that a building damaged in the bottom corner would lean or fall to that side but that's all it would be, a guess.
The 9-11 Cover Up Ends: July 9, 2008
555Popular Mechanics examines the evidence and consults the experts to refute the most persistent conspiracy theories of September 11
Popular Mechanics Report of 9-11
It's not rocket science.
The 9-11 Cover Up Ends: July 9, 2008
556Rick Reuben wrote:Are you aware that the official version said for five years that there were zero deaths inside WTC7, and then, I think in 2006, a single death was reported from inside WTC7?
well that would make sense, as according to the dude's testimony, when he arrived, the place was pretty empty. i would assume that the "bodies" he has to step over in what was the lobby of WTC7 were not neccesarily "in" WTC7 when they died - i would assume that those people died in the towers or outside the towers when they collapsed and were carried to the WTC7 Lobby area when you know...
this happened:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/963ac/963ac6095601ba2c7d6404f268d7d82714482d98" alt="Image"
and again...the guy entered WTC7 before the towers collapsed and then they collapsed while he was on the 6th/8th floor (i forget which one exactly) and the above happened...he returns to the ground floor and is "shocked" to see that its an absolute disaster area?
andyk
LingLing - www.myspace.com/linglingchicago
The 9-11 Cover Up Ends: July 9, 2008
557What does 9/11 have to do with O.J. Simpson's birthdate?
www.23beatsoff.blogspot.com
Nina wrote: We're all growing too old to expect solace from watching Camus and Ayn Rand copulate.
The 9-11 Cover Up Ends: July 9, 2008
558The idea that sky scrapers might ever fall sideways is hilarious to me and probably the most consistant reason for me opening threads and web-pages like this one.
Do some people live in a magical world with no sense of scale, where toy motor cars compact and explode if rolled if the edge of a table?
Do some people live in a magical world with no sense of scale, where toy motor cars compact and explode if rolled if the edge of a table?
The 9-11 Cover Up Ends: July 9, 2008
559big_dave wrote:
Do some people live in a magical world with no sense of scale, where toy motor cars compact and explode if rolled [off] the edge of a table?
Tonka 4ever.
The 9-11 Cover Up Ends: July 9, 2008
560big_dave wrote:The idea that sky scrapers might ever fall sideways is hilarious
they're just like big giant trees! eyewitness accounts be damned, my number one reason for calling bullshit on all these "theories" is from the simple ignorance of basic rules of physics.
and. one of their main arguments is that all the collapses look as if they were via "controlled demolition". i for one need to know what an out-of-control, good ole fashioned anything goes, buck wild, crazy nuts bonkers, free-for-all demolition looks like before i can understand this distinction.