Website: Pitchfork
2stewie wrote:Contains some of the most pretentious reviews ever written. Crap.
If you mean prentious in the sense that they pretend to have insight into the essence of good music why is it that critics always like bands that have ugly album covers and are the best version of the worst shit and Loudon Wainwright lll and Warren Zevon and Yo La Tango I have to agree with you.
Website: Pitchfork
4Bradley R. Weissenberger wrote:I am delighted to submit a CRAP vote for Pitchfork.
Website: Pitchfork
5Bradley R. Weissenberger wrote:Bradley R. Weissenberger wrote:I am pleased to issue a CRAP vote for Pitchfork.
Website: Pitchfork
6Bradley R. Weissenberger wrote:Bradley R. Weissenberger wrote:Bradley R. Weissenberger wrote:I am ecstatic to register a CRAP vote for Pitchfork.
Website: Pitchfork
7Bradley R. Weissenberger wrote:Bradley R. Weissenberger wrote:Bradley R. Weissenberger wrote:Bradley R. Weissenberger wrote:I am thrilled to proffer a CRAP vote for Pitchfork.
Website: Pitchfork
8They're useful for news and whatnot, but their reviews are mostly mindbendingly dumb, and they don't appear to have a lot of foresight (regarding the actual lifespan of some of these 9.X rated albums).
CRAP.
CRAP.
Website: Pitchfork
9pitchfork really seems to drive people crazy, I dig em, I think they are not afraid to call a shit record shite
not crap
not crap
Website: Pitchfork
10the Classical wrote:pitchfork really seems to drive people crazy, I dig em, I think they are not afraid to call a shit record shite
not crap
Yeah, they're also not afraid to give shit albums 10 and 10 albums shit, usually the former being the case. If they do ever have a decent review it's usually a guest writer.Yeah they're MEAN SHIT/CRAP
0. Oh and those concept "clever" story type reviews crapcrapcrap