Colonel Panic wrote:AdamPee wrote:Mark Hansen wrote:It could be argued that providing the seed is the least part of fatherhood.
I would argue that providing seed is in no part fatherhood whatsoever. It is like saying that a car is not manufactured by a company, but the mine that the metal for the chasis was mined from.
Sure, it wouldn't be there without it, but it doesn't make a damn sight of difference if it comes from someplace else entirely.
I'd rather say that 50% of the design and engineering plans for the car come from the father, but the other 50%, plus
all the materials and the entire means of production are contributed by the mother.
I am afraid you misunderstood me, I am not meaning to discount the invaluable positive (and sure, possibly negative) impact of having a beneficial paternal influence in a child's life, but my point was more that the location of the materials (or if you leave the metaphor, semen) is so comparatively unimportant when compared to the people who raise the child (or, in the metaphor, the people who designed the car).
And Mr. Ruben, if I were to poke a hole in a condom and get a lady knocked up against her will, should I be entitled to determine whether the woman carries the child, or would it be a mutual decision?
To be more crass, if I were to rape a woman, would I be entitled to parental rights until I was proven guilty? As I am presumed innocent and the proceedings would inevitably drag out for longer than nine months, would I be entitled to these parental rights until I am convicted? This system would have the dual effect of bogging down our court system with bogus claims of abuse to deny people care that they require if they have actually been in a crisis.
Finally, if there were a risk to the mother's life, and the father wanted her to hold on to the child if I meant the woman's death, and the woman would rather live, would she be forced to die for the child?
If the decision does not have to be mutual, who would decide which member has the greater claim? Would we further expand government bureaucracy (that if I am not mistaken from your former posts, you are against)? Who would be willing to foot the bill for endless mediations between the parties?
How could this system possibly ever work in any facet whatsoever?