100
by Tommy_Archive
VaticanShotglass wrote:Can't sleep so here's a question I'm just going to rip from a Gearpage thread that no one responded to as I have exactly the same concern:As we know the vintage fuzzes (or vintage circuits in new fuzzes) don't play nice with a buffer in front.My plan is to set up an overdrive pedal chain and a fuzz pedal chain.Can anyone speak to the buffer + fuzzes thing with the LS-2?The pedal (LS-2) has input and output jacks, and send/return jacks for loops A and B. The incoming signal is buffered, then split three ways: to the output mixer/buffer, to loop A send and loop B send. If left empty, the send/return jack in each loop are connected internally, to simply pass the signal along. Each loop has a level control, located after the return jack. The return signals then join the main bypass signal in the output mixer/buffer, and is then sent out through the output jack. https://www.thegearpage.net/board/index ... z.2037693/In my case I want to run a Rat in parallel with an EQD soundshank, which is a great buzzaround clone.So what's the question here? I have an LS-2 I use parallel like you describe. The LS-2 is buffered and affects a Fuzz Face/Rangemaster/etc the same way other buffered pedals do. The only difference here is that you have control over signal amount. If you don't like what a buffered pedal does before your fuzz pedal of choice now, you're not going to like what the LS-2 does to it without using some sort of impedance "correcting" device (maybe Radial) in the loop.A Rat sounds fine with a buffered pedal in front of it. Is the Soundshank the problem child here?