19
by bleh_Archive
BusBus wrote:The Fireface is sort of winning because you can use all the analog ins at the same time, whereas I think the UA you can't use the mic pres and the #1-4 line ins at the same time. The UA of course has the powered plugs for tracking, so it's still in the running. this is a touch inaccurate. on the fireface, there are 8 line in on the rear, and 4 mic pre/line in on the front. inputs 7/8 are switchable to either rear line 7/8, or to front inputs 1/2. front inputs 3/4 are line in 9/10.rule of thumb: every built in preamp in every interface ever is total shit. shopping for an interface, you mainly want the best quality line level a/d and d/a you can afford. the UAD looks nice, but i could give a shit about realtime plugin processing while tracking. tracking, i am only concerned with getting the signal to the computer in the highest quality possible. i really cannot recommend the fireface enough. i bought it because they were the best quality converters in that ballpark...the lynx were just coming out, but a bit more expensive. myteks were a bit too expensive for me. i'm sure there is some new shit that is awesome, but yeah. i paid around 1k a piece. the UFX effects, again, while cool, i could care less about. i would shoot for finding the original series cheaply.anyways, with two, i can do 20 analog lines in/out, and there are another 16-20 digital channels to use. all zero latency monitoring, and the total mix interface allows insane routing capabilities.for the prfnycbbq, we ran the mics from the stage to my external preamps, then to the rme for recording, which passed each mic signal zero latency back out the outputs, which then went to the board for the live mixing. two days straight of the entire show running through the interface back out to the board. one glitch and the party came to a grinding halt. zero issues. rock solid.