74
by Andrew_Archive
Justin Foley wrote:That graph seems to suggest bad things, but you can't assume strike activity = labor power. Union activity has moved over into electoral politics over that same time horizon with limited, but in some cases real, success. [...]Labor's future doesn't mean replicating the tactics of 50 years ago. At least not over the foreseeable time horizon.= JustinWell, lobbying and shovelling money into the Democratic Party's coffers -- the strategy of the last 30-odd years -- doesn't have a particularly heartening track record. I would be curious how anyone could see it as a record of anything but devastating failure, in fact. I'd be really curious what you make of Jane McAlvey's Raising Expectations and Raising Hell or Steve Early's recent Save Our Unions: Dispatches from a movement in distress. I'd also love to hear what you make of Sam Gindin's analysis. I ask because I consider him among the top 2 or 3 most incisive living voices and minds on the state of organized labor in North America (also a wonderfully accommodating and humble dude). He was a 27-year staffer with the Auto Workers. Here's the teaser for his article on the UAW defeat in Chattanooga: For a number of reasons, U.S. unions are on the defensive “ from concerted attacks by employers, the political and cultural effects of 30 years of neoliberalism as well as their inability to build resistance in workplaces and communities. The unionization rate in the private sector is down to 6.7 per cent and a central pillar of union strategy has been to organize the unorganized. The United Auto Workers (UAW) “ which lost tens of thousands of members in the past decade “ has emphasized the centrality of organizing non-union foreign-owned auto plants, recently located in the almost completely non-union and politically conservative south. The strategy was to make a breakthrough in one plant, and build from there.The Volkswagen plant in Chattanooga, Tennessee was their key target. The union worked out a deal with the company, supporting the concept of Germany's ˜works councils, and a series of agreements, to gain the company's neutrality in what was to be a three-day vote. The agreement included the union's acceptance of forms of partnership with the employer, a verbal commitment to keep wage costs below that of the Detroit Three, and evidently, promises not to engage in house visits with perspective members. As well, there was little organizing in local communities “ something absolutely essential in a culture hostile to independent unionism, with low-wage workplaces, high unemployment, and general support for conservative ideas.http://www.socialistproject.ca/bullet/939.phpWhen I talk to paid organizers off record, they're quite honest about the fact their unions' overall strategies range from absent or misguided, at best, to cynical and self-defeating at worst. They acknowledge (off record) that top brass does not want an active base with a voice, let alone a militant base. These aren't apparatchiks needless to say, but they are dedicated unionists and staffers who know very well that the state of organized labor is fucking dire, and it has been for decades.Those who put a smiley face on everything are more part of the problem than the solution in my estimation. Not unlike Democratic Party hacks who suggest that despite the fact the Dems govern to the right of Nixon, it's all good. We can either accept that trade unions have been in crisis for decades or we can deny it. Density is a crude measure in some respects but it still captures an important reality. Let's stick with the US (OECD data): 1980: 22.1% of workforce1985: 17.41990: 15.51995: 14.32000: 12.92005: 122010: 11.42012: 11.1Anyone who speaks about the outdated strategies of "50 years ago" is not exactly looking reality in the face, from where some people sit. More Sam: The Crisis in Trade UnionismFor some three decades now, labour has been stumbling on, unable to organizationally or ideologically rebut the attacks summarized as ˜neoliberalism. Though the Great Financial Crisis held out the promise of finally exposing the right and its supporters and potentially opening the door to a union offensive and possible revival, the attacks on labour actually intensified and labour continues to have no coherent counter-response. http://www.socialistproject.ca/bullet/878.phpThat is reality. Dealing with reality is a good starting point, I think.