9
by greg_Archive
numberthirty wrote:greg wrote:PEPPER! wrote:traffic will super suck when they fix the bridge and I'm not looking forward to taking my kid to Lane every morning next year, but spend a minute under that thing and tell me they don't need to do it. try not to get hit by falling concrete.Western viaduct over Belmont?They aren't fixing it, they are tearing it down.I wish they were fixing it.Chris Hall mentioned this to me a while back. We were wondering out loud why a cash strapped city wouldn't just repair it.Once I thought about it, I don't know that that bridge would be able to structurally survive repairs/resurfacing.Here's a funny thing. When they first started talking about fixing that viaduct, I remember dummies in news articles talking about how bad the surface was on it, but the surface was/still is totally fine. However, the bridge over the river (immediately south, connected) was dangerously bad. I can only assume the interviewees didn't know what was being proposed and were referring to river bridge or conflating the two.
Greg Norman FG