120
by llllllllllllllllllllllll_Archive
Clyde wrote:llllllllllllllllllllllll wrote: I just don t get why everyone has such a hardon for going after Nagle.1-Her thesis in KAN that SJWs are responsible for the rise of the alt-right, as well as accusations of plagarism in said book. FWIW, I'm simply repeating the criticisms here, I have not read the book.2-Her article, "On the Left Case Against Open Borders," and that the piece was published by in a right-wing, nationalist journal.3-Accusations of transphobia. (Again, I haven't followed this one very closely.) https://twitter.com/zei\_nabq/status/922916996525703168As far as I understand it, #3 ties in to #1. I ve read that book and I think that is a reach. Re: #2, that article was clumsy but people already had it out for her by then. There were a couple of high profile leftists condemning the article while saying that no one on the left is calling for open borders, but that s not true, unless you don t consider certain strains of anarchism to be in the left. I do feel like her references to the Koch brothers (who support open borders) and Sanders (who doesn t, because of the Koch bros) were largely unanswered by the critics. Keep in mind that this particular outrage was also hot of the heels of accusations of plagarism in KAN that were thrown around by a journalist. They were totally disproven, but people kept echoing the accusations after the fact. I ve taken her appearing in that journal in the same way she appeared on Tucker Carlson and in the same way she would debate alt-right weirdos. When Richard Spencer was on the rise Nagle and others expressed a lot of disdain for how the mainstream media was completely taken for a ride by that guy. It seems to me that she thought it was a good idea to present leftist ideas to different crowds as a sort of counter argument. However when she did start to do that, you had this soft spoken Irish girl doing it and not a dude ready for a fight, like the historian who Tucker Carlson cussed out, so I think that there was a sort of complicity assumed there.
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll