79
by the$inmusicisallmine_Archive
OrthodoxEaster wrote:As some of you may know from a thread I created in the autumn, I'm currently using an old JVC AL-F3. Last fall, the auto return had stopped working, so now I must cue it manually. No big deal. Also, the power doesn't turn off unless I physically unplug it from my receiver. Slightly bigger deal but remedied by a power strip or just a gentle unplugging. It's not a very sexy turntable, but I've had it forever and it sounds fine.Today I stumbled on a Technics SL-B101, going for $80 at a local electronics shop. I know nothing about this deck.And a Technics SL-1300 MK II, for $300 at the same place. Have read that the tone arm on these tends to crap out pretty easily, despite them being lovely machines.Both serviced, new cartridges, etc.Still, prices seemed a little high to me. Guy was firm. Your opinions? Move on and keep looking?Thanks.the SL-1300 is a semi-serious piece of kit. I don't consider it a true hi-fi turntable because I hate tonearms that have removable headshells. Its more of a consumer version of a DJ style turntable. And the tonearm is not removable or replaceable, so you can't upgrade to a good one. With that said, it will last you a long time. Of course, $300 is getting into the range where you can get a low-level Rega, Music Hall or Pro-ject turntable. I have not compared these tables to the technics, but I prefer belt to direct drive, and the tonearms on those guys do not have removable headshells, which I see as a positive. I would bet money that a used Rega 2 or 3 would shit all over the Technics. https://www.audiogon.com/listings/lis9c ... turntablesSo, bottom line, its a decent turntable that will last a long time, but it may not be the best sounding option. If the rest of your system is sort of middle of the road, and you don't have plans to upgrade, then the $300 technics is probably a good move.