Re: Tipping The Sacred Cows 2.0

352
Anthony Flack wrote: Tue Oct 11, 2022 8:11 pm performative
God I hate that word. Seeing it makes me feel so tired. Disingenuous, false, inauthentic, misleading, ostentatious. These all work. That word just immediately makes me think of white people righteously policing the instagram posts of other white people. It gives me a headache.

But I suppose that's my problem, not yours.

I was weaned on Bill Murray movies, but signs have pointed to him being shitty as a person for a long time. And that movie Rock The Casbah fucking sucked.
Radio show https://www.wmse.org/program/the-tom-wa ... xperience/
My band https://redstuff.bandcamp.com/
Solo project https://tomwanderer.bandcamp.com/

Re: Tipping The Sacred Cows 2.0

353
On a related note: movies on 35mm (and often 70mm) print stock generally look like shit compared to DCI-compliant, 4k, 12 or 14-bit color channels digital cinema running at 60 fps.

Just before the pandemic, I got to see a fresh 70mm print of 2001: A Space Odyssey at a local classic movie house.

As great a movie as it is, I noticed:
- gate flicker is really noticeable at 24 fps, especially with a large shutter on a 70mm print. There is A LOT of blanking time involved in moving and projecting a frame of 70mm
- Color saturation suffers when "un-compressing" an anamorphic frame. Even non-anamorph prints have worse color gamut and saturation than digital.
- After viewing digital content for 15+ years, the grain in a print becomes really obvious, as it does it's little brownian noise dance around the screen
- Along with grain, the non-uniformity of the print chemistry and variations in the processing chemistry really stand out
- Dynamic range is poor compared to digital. The blacks aren't very black, the whites are hazy and muddled. Shadow details get lost and washout is common.

Additionally, that classic movie house had poor acoustics and the audio was imbalanced and had poor surround distribution.

Re: Tipping The Sacred Cows 2.0

354
numberthirty wrote: Tue Oct 11, 2022 11:24 pmYou want to understand why I love Dolly Parton? To me, I have a tough time understanding that there are human beings who exist who do not get why other human beings would love this...

Hey now, that's ^ one hell of a dog song! Am not that educated about or predisposed toward country music, really, but credit where credit's due. Proper stuff!

Parton is also, as mentioned, a class act, as far as successful public figures go. More people like her and fewer knobs like Musk, Ye, Trump, Boebert, etc., and we'd all be better off.
ZzzZzzZzzz . . .

New Novel.

Re: Tipping The Sacred Cows 2.0

356
Dave N. wrote: Wed Oct 12, 2022 6:35 am
Kniferide wrote: Tue Oct 11, 2022 11:39 pm I'm pretty down with people saying whatever on this thread but Dolly is a fucking bad mother fucker from the tips of her toes to the tips of her nips. She just fucking rules. Hands down a perfect person, musically. socially... the best.
I recommend getting on Indeed and checking out how much an entry-level Dollywood worker makes per hour.

She’s great, but far from perfect.
What should a corndog cooker make?
Was Japmn.

New OST project: https://japmn.bandcamp.com/album/flight-ost
https://japmn.bandcamp.com/album/numberwitch
https://boneandbell.com/site/music.html

Re: Tipping The Sacred Cows 2.0

357
Kniferide wrote: Wed Oct 12, 2022 3:24 pm
Dave N. wrote: Wed Oct 12, 2022 6:35 am
Kniferide wrote: Tue Oct 11, 2022 11:39 pm I'm pretty down with people saying whatever on this thread but Dolly is a fucking bad mother fucker from the tips of her toes to the tips of her nips. She just fucking rules. Hands down a perfect person, musically. socially... the best.
I recommend getting on Indeed and checking out how much an entry-level Dollywood worker makes per hour.

She’s great, but far from perfect.
What should a corndog cooker make?
Isn’t that the name of a Minutemen album?

I hadn’t checked in awhile, but it looks like wages went up at Dollywood, and everyone gets free college tuition. I suppose she’s closer to perfect than most of us.

Re: Tipping The Sacred Cows 2.0

360
Geiginni wrote: Wed Oct 12, 2022 1:55 pm On a related note: movies on 35mm (and often 70mm) print stock generally look like shit compared to DCI-compliant, 4k, 12 or 14-bit color channels digital cinema running at 60 fps.

Just before the pandemic, I got to see a fresh 70mm print of 2001: A Space Odyssey at a local classic movie house.

As great a movie as it is, I noticed:
- gate flicker is really noticeable at 24 fps, especially with a large shutter on a 70mm print. There is A LOT of blanking time involved in moving and projecting a frame of 70mm
- Color saturation suffers when "un-compressing" an anamorphic frame. Even non-anamorph prints have worse color gamut and saturation than digital.
- After viewing digital content for 15+ years, the grain in a print becomes really obvious, as it does it's little brownian noise dance around the screen
- Along with grain, the non-uniformity of the print chemistry and variations in the processing chemistry really stand out
- Dynamic range is poor compared to digital. The blacks aren't very black, the whites are hazy and muddled. Shadow details get lost and washout is common.

Additionally, that classic movie house had poor acoustics and the audio was imbalanced and had poor surround distribution.
This, with all the nagging details included, actually sounds like a really nice evening.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest