Upon someone giving quick praise to the new Suffocation album I thought I’d like to read a bit more about the genre they live in on this forum.
I’ve always liked death metal but I think the past two years have been explosive for me and my listening habits regarding this genre. It makes up a good deal of what I listen to now.
What’s everyone reckon!
Frankly, there’s a lot to pull apart here cos it can be utter shit and completely awesome. Sometimes within the one album. I particularly enjoy that it can get VERY silly.
Is ulcerate death metal? What’s the weirdest death metal album you’re aware of? Why does Australia breed the best death metal? What do you think of the current revival by bands like tomb mold and the label 20 buck spin. What’s your fave classic.
I could have made this a general discussion but i thought it’d be fun to see the stats.
Re: Death Metal
2I dislike calling an entire genre CRAP, but it’s really not my thing.
jason (he/him/his) from volo (illinois)
Re: Death Metal
3Weirdest? Try Suppuration's The Cube. Also, there's no way that the best stuff comes from Australia.
Last edited by Krev on Thu Nov 09, 2023 11:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
We're headed for social anarchy when people start pissing on bookstores.
Re: Death Metal
5Where’s the best stuff come from? What is the best stuff? I wanna listen.Krev wrote: Thu Nov 09, 2023 11:34 pm Weirdest? Try Suppuration's The Cube. Also, there's no way that the best stuff comes from Australia.
Re: Death Metal
6I'm down with a lot of the genre from about 87 to 94 / 95-ish.
By 87 you start to see a clear musical evolution - techniques and tones and arrangements that are a full step away from conventional music.
There was a similar spirt of evolution / revolution early on in thrash but outside of the best bands it just didn't go far enough to really turn into a radically new form of music like DM did. I like a lot of thrash bands, but outside of maybe Slayer I don't think much of it holds up today in terms of shock and aggression - normies can easily tolerate 'Master of Puppets' but I reckon you would still puzzle or even alienate a mainstream audience if 'Empathological Necroticism' was played on a sitcom.
I start to tune out around 94 as it became clear that there were very strict limits with audience numbers / expectations that sorta strangled the genre's development- I suspect I'm in a minority, but I find that slew of records that Colombia backed are ARTISTICALLY awesome - but when that all failed to sell (often those albums sold substantially worse than the previous indie efforts distributed via Combat) it killed any ambition and growth within the scene.
IMO the scene regressed back to the underground and often got very dull - sometimes technically dazzling, but handicapped by the core audience's cult-like aesthetic expectations. (You can hear this shift between different approaches and outlooks most clearly between Morbid Angel's Domination and Formulas Fatal to the Flesh.)
The chances of anything idiosyncratic or different breaking through seemed to vanish w/ every generation. Now it's a cosplay scene, bordering on parody, dull because we can easily hear the vastly superior source material.
I personally don't like Gorguts or Nile or Necrophagist at all, but I felt sad that these seriously advanced and visionary musicians were wasted in that ghetto scene. You have to follow so many aesthetic and contextual rules to play the game and that prevents 99% of people checking it out - very dispiriting vibes for me.
By 87 you start to see a clear musical evolution - techniques and tones and arrangements that are a full step away from conventional music.
There was a similar spirt of evolution / revolution early on in thrash but outside of the best bands it just didn't go far enough to really turn into a radically new form of music like DM did. I like a lot of thrash bands, but outside of maybe Slayer I don't think much of it holds up today in terms of shock and aggression - normies can easily tolerate 'Master of Puppets' but I reckon you would still puzzle or even alienate a mainstream audience if 'Empathological Necroticism' was played on a sitcom.
I start to tune out around 94 as it became clear that there were very strict limits with audience numbers / expectations that sorta strangled the genre's development- I suspect I'm in a minority, but I find that slew of records that Colombia backed are ARTISTICALLY awesome - but when that all failed to sell (often those albums sold substantially worse than the previous indie efforts distributed via Combat) it killed any ambition and growth within the scene.
IMO the scene regressed back to the underground and often got very dull - sometimes technically dazzling, but handicapped by the core audience's cult-like aesthetic expectations. (You can hear this shift between different approaches and outlooks most clearly between Morbid Angel's Domination and Formulas Fatal to the Flesh.)
The chances of anything idiosyncratic or different breaking through seemed to vanish w/ every generation. Now it's a cosplay scene, bordering on parody, dull because we can easily hear the vastly superior source material.
I personally don't like Gorguts or Nile or Necrophagist at all, but I felt sad that these seriously advanced and visionary musicians were wasted in that ghetto scene. You have to follow so many aesthetic and contextual rules to play the game and that prevents 99% of people checking it out - very dispiriting vibes for me.
Re: Death Metal
7This is an amazing response.M.H wrote: Fri Nov 10, 2023 3:59 am I'm down with a lot of the genre from about 87 to 94 / 95-ish.
By 87 you start to see a clear musical evolution - techniques and tones and arrangements that are a full step away from conventional music.
There was a similar spirt of evolution / revolution early on in thrash but outside of the best bands it just didn't go far enough to really turn into a radically new form of music like DM did. I like a lot of thrash bands, but outside of maybe Slayer I don't think much of it holds up today in terms of shock and aggression - normies can easily tolerate 'Master of Puppets' but I reckon you would still puzzle or even alienate a mainstream audience if 'Empathological Necroticism' was played on a sitcom.
I start to tune out around 94 as it became clear that there were very strict limits with audience numbers / expectations that sorta strangled the genre's development- I suspect I'm in a minority, but I find that slew of records that Colombia backed are ARTISTICALLY awesome - but when that all failed to sell (often those albums sold substantially worse than the previous indie efforts distributed via Combat) it killed any ambition and growth within the scene.
IMO the scene regressed back to the underground and often got very dull - sometimes technically dazzling, but handicapped by the core audience's cult-like aesthetic expectations. (You can hear this shift between different approaches and outlooks most clearly between Morbid Angel's Domination and Formulas Fatal to the Flesh.)
The chances of anything idiosyncratic or different breaking through seemed to vanish w/ every generation. Now it's a cosplay scene, bordering on parody, dull because we can easily hear the vastly superior source material.
I personally don't like Gorguts or Nile or Necrophagist at all, but I felt sad that these seriously advanced and visionary musicians were wasted in that ghetto scene. You have to follow so many aesthetic and contextual rules to play the game and that prevents 99% of people checking it out - very dispiriting vibes for me.
I really enjoy the new stuff (gorguts, necrophagist and beyond) but I was born in ‘84 and didn’t get exposed to the really great bands until I was in my twenties. I sort of found death metal through portal and all that. So now I listen to the classics and hear potentially an entirely different thing compared to someone who grew up listening to them.
I really respect hearing that long breakdown from someone I presume who has been with this stuff for a lot longer than I have.
Re: Death Metal
8I kind of had to look up who this label actually refers to today. And it falls into the respect the grind, but not something I listen to with any regularity. I don't think I own anything from genre outside of some black metal and classic Slayer releases....and I don't think those even count. I did go to this though, and it was a fun endurance test. Awesome lineup looking back at it.
Re: Death Metal
9The really low growl vocals are a deal breaker for me, just can't take them seriously.
High pitch snarly screams yes, but those bands tend to get labeled as grindcore. Yes, metal sub-genres get really silly.
High pitch snarly screams yes, but those bands tend to get labeled as grindcore. Yes, metal sub-genres get really silly.
Re: Death Metal
10NOt Crap
a few of my Favourites of recentish vintage
[media]<iframe style="border: 0; width: 350px; height: 470px;" src="https://bandcamp.com/EmbeddedPlayer/alb ... rent=true/" seamless><a href=" of the Archangels by Dead Congregation</a></iframe>[/media]
The new Suffocation is spectacular, and Immolation continue to amaze.
As for being Evil, I.M.S.77. Sure, whatever, the right DM album always seems to improve my mood
a few of my Favourites of recentish vintage
[media]<iframe style="border: 0; width: 350px; height: 470px;" src="https://bandcamp.com/EmbeddedPlayer/alb ... rent=true/" seamless><a href=" of the Archangels by Dead Congregation</a></iframe>[/media]
The new Suffocation is spectacular, and Immolation continue to amaze.
As for being Evil, I.M.S.77. Sure, whatever, the right DM album always seems to improve my mood