who was most popular?

ben franklin
Total votes: 3 (18%)
general lee
Total votes: 1 (6%)
j.e.hoover
Total votes: 1 (6%)
general macarthur (No votes)
alan greenspan
Total votes: 1 (6%)
kissinger
Total votes: 4 (24%)
oppenheimer
Total votes: 3 (18%)
tony fauci
Total votes: 2 (12%)
eliot ness (No votes)
general powell
Total votes: 1 (6%)
chief justice john marshall
Total votes: 1 (6%)
james comey (No votes)
ambassador michelle kwan (No votes)
Total votes: 17

Re: Who's the most influential unelected u.s. government official?

15
Curry Pervert wrote: Sun Dec 03, 2023 6:33 pm Edward Bernays should be on the list.
fascinating bio. i had no idea there used to be ideals in pr.
horrendous ideals, but still.
bob dylan wrote:i hope that you die
steve albini wrote:i hope you choke
thom yorke wrote:we hope that you choke
ChudFusk wrote: Sun Dec 08, 2024 1:36 amI do hope you are a smoker and enjoy your red meat.

Re: Who's the most influential unelected u.s. government official?

17
i wasn't thinking "deep state" when i first asked this, but it fits i guess...



of course vivek could just admit that afghanistan was more stable when we were in charge. do people still think trump was right there?
bob dylan wrote:i hope that you die
steve albini wrote:i hope you choke
thom yorke wrote:we hope that you choke
ChudFusk wrote: Sun Dec 08, 2024 1:36 amI do hope you are a smoker and enjoy your red meat.

Re: Who's the most influential unelected u.s. government official?

19
Out of the list presented, it's John Marshall; Kissinger is, maybe, a distant second.

John Marshall empowered the U.S. Supreme Court in a way that was entirely unnecessary: the facts in Marbury v. Madison could've been easily resolved without resort to enshrining the doctrine of judicial review; the motherfucker was personally involved in the facts of the case! He shouldn't have had anything to do with the result. In a way he began another time-honored tradition of the U.S. Supreme Court: working backwards from the result you want and twisting the law to fit it, and refusing to recuse oneself despite overwhelming evidence of a potential bias. Judicial review's effect on public policy is utterly incalculable

Marshall's opinion in Johnson v. M'Intosh, his delineation of the "discovery doctrine" and conclusions about sovereignty, was monumentally nonsensical (if not entirely idiotic or disingenuous), but was taken seriously all over the world and only recently has been called into question; the devastating impact this decision had on American Indians is also incalculable, and his attempts to ameliorate the effects with subsequent decisions did nothing to stop the continued annihilation of American Indian populations/cultures.
f/k/a: chromodynamic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests