Rejoyce!!!

51
kenoki wrote:But what if the person originally posted that picture on the same message board it is reposted on?

the picture was not reposted - it was used as an avatar to annoy Rachael.
that couldn't be more different.

If everybody would just stop paying attention to Walter, he wouldn't have anything to feed off of.
Everytime you tell him to 'go die', he likes it - why doesn't everybody understand this?

Rachael, you're one of the few girls that post here - there's always going to be some asshole that's out to get a reaction out of you by saying something degrading, or just plain ignorant.

what would be the fun of trolling a messageboard if nobody was offended by what you did?

anyway, sorry for the rant - i just think this is getting out of hand - i've seen MUCH worse than Walter

oh, and Kenoki, your debating skills are a little rusty.

Rejoyce!!!

52
What are you talking about? Is there a subject at hand? Is there any reason for me to stop in?

Not to sound egocentric, but I understand the basic concept of phase, have mic'd drumsets, amps, acoustic instruments, and love hearing others impessions of various micing techniques, equipment choices, etc. as well as replying to the kids in Indiana or something about what a 'mic preamp' is.......

Occasionally an opinion on where the world stands is an interesting topic, but mostly I come to this RECORDING STUDIO MESSAGE BOARD because I am interested in recording.

n
------
www.thehomerecordingproject.com

Rejoyce!!!

54
Oh N.C.! This is the general board! We talk about general things here.

Feel free to start a new post about what you want to talk about, but we love talking about general things on the general discussions board.

I'm sure many people are interested those things. They will reply to a new post, I promise!

I hope I'm not stepping out of line here, but you can find lots of other impressions of lots of different techniques if only you search a bit.
...act fast, while the rates are low...

Rejoyce!!!

57
kenoki wrote:So, what your saying Iron Engine is that as long as nobody notices, it doesn't matter? But if someone does notice, you should take it down. So basically, it's ok to be internet immoral from the get-go so long as you say sorry afterwards. I like that method. It's so American.


Not quite. I've obviously made this too complex for you so let me try again.

What my (as opposed to I'm) saying is, if you are using someone's picture in a way that they haven't approved of and they ask you to stop, you have two options: comply with their wishes, or be regarded as a piece of donkey shit. Walter has clearly chosen the latter, as I've seen - on this very board no less - Rachael ask him repeatedly to take her visage out of his avatar and he reacts as though he has some right to keep using it against her wishes. He does not, hence I have determined that he is a piece of donkey shit. If you think Walter should have the right to keep using her picture against her wishes, you too are a piece of donkey shit.

The case of using someone else's likeness without their knowledge should most likely be approached on a case-by-case basis. There are too many possibilities to come up with a sensible singular policy. All I was addressing is the case where person A uses person B's picture, and person B asks them to stop.
Rick Reuben wrote:You are dumber than week-old donuts.

Rejoyce!!!

58
slowriot wrote:i just read through this thread and i feel like i lost five minutes of my life. high school called, they want their temper tantrums back.


This thread is probably not the only one capable of wasting your time, have you considered the possibility that internet forums are not for you?
Rick Reuben wrote:You are dumber than week-old donuts.

Rejoyce!!!

59
ironyengine wrote:
slowriot wrote:i just read through this thread and i feel like i lost five minutes of my life. high school called, they want their temper tantrums back.


This thread is probably not the only one capable of wasting your time, have you considered the possibility that internet forums are not for you?


no i'm just used to more substantive conversation on this board than most others. it is like a safe haven from childishness.

Rejoyce!!!

60
slowriot wrote:no i'm just used to more substantive conversation on this board than most others. it is like a safe haven from childishness.


I was all set to agree with you - possibly even to quit the board myself, in a small effort to return it to its idyllic non-chlidish state - but then I read this.

Perhaps it would be more useful if you just clarified what kinds of childishness you're willing to accept on the board, so we have guidelines to stick to?
Rick Reuben wrote:You are dumber than week-old donuts.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests