Re: What are you buying, What's on its way?
1101I prefer the Staytrem to the Mastery as well. Just checked the Staytrem page and he's up and running just fine, there's no notice about long wait times like there used to be either, so that's good.
I've never had an issue with my Mastery. I always hated the Mustang style bridges on a Jazzmaster and the Staytrem is just that, no? The biggest improvement Mastery made for me was that it does not move in the thimbles and is locked in place. Improved sustain and resonance quite a bit, and on occasion the stock bridge would slide forward and not return to zero, totally fucking up the tuning completely. The floating bridge was a gimmick and a mistake imo. I like that fancy other new thing but it moves (no thanks) and is spendy.MoreSpaceEcho wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2024 9:10 am I prefer the Staytrem to the Mastery as well. Just checked the Staytrem page and he's up and running just fine, there's no notice about long wait times like there used to be either, so that's good.
Beat me to it!
Three. If you run a wound 3rd like me, too bad. Whereas the Tele bridge can do a good job with pairs on each saddle.losthighway wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2024 6:39 pm Mastery is nice. My only beef is you can't individually intonate the strings. They're in clusters (was it 2 strings on each bar?).
- Staytrem does not have individual saddle height adjustment, but instead comes in either 7.25" or 9.5" radius which solves things.Garth wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2024 8:46 pm Seems like they're all befuggled in some way.
Original JM Bridge: uh wtf Leo
Mustang Bridge: at least it's better than the first option
Mastery: solves the floating bit but that's actually a feature some folks like, more importantly, one is unable to completely set intonation on each string.
Staytrem: I have not seen one in person but it looks like there's no individual saddle height adjustment? I guess you could use shims maybe?
Tuffset: Seems to solve most of these issues...but it reverts back to the floating/rocking trem...
Seems like none of the options do everything: Fully intonatable, firm & locking w/ out rocking/floating, full height adjustment.
Right, but i'll give that a pass as there weren't a whole lot of string options in 1950, nor was intonation a huge concern (a 1953 Les Paul had ONE saddle, lest we forget). A three saddle bridge was reasonably intonateable (sp?) given wound E-G and plain B-E. Nowadays there are of course many options to convert a three saddle bridge to have proper intonation on many string sets, be it compensated or tilting saddles. Mastery (in 2007, mind you) said "i have a great idea....TWO saddles". 60 years of guitar engineering before them, and knowing full and well that people nowadays play on all kinds of string sets and tunings, they limited their design to 'your top 3 must be all wound or plain and your bottom three must be all wound or plain. Its shit engineering. How can you make a Jazzmaster bridge that cant serve Sonic Youth?
On their recent livestream for the Walls Have Ears release, Thurston mentioned (or was responding to) being out of tune. He could be revising history, or just giving insight, but his response was something like tuning issues were something that always bothered him, but he was too lazy to do anything about it until later on. Go figure.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests