Re: What are you reading?

612
kokorodoko wrote: Sat Jun 29, 2024 1:52 pmDecided to try a translation …

… the switch isn't remarkable.
One thing that I’m an anti-fan of however is what I believe is called localization - the attempt to find an equivalent of some place-specific thing.

In Woman in the Dunes there is a part where a man is reading a newspaper, and one of the headlines tells of a meeting/congress of some trade union federation, which in translation was named LO - so if you’re American, imagine reading ”AFL-CIO meeting” and you’d be like ”I know that doesn’t exist in Japan, come on”.

Does the exact opposite of the intended. Shifts focus away from the content of the text - translation is supposed to be invisible as far as possible. And would be very easy to avoid by simply saying ”the trade union so-and-so”.

Clumsy examples like this abound in this practice.
born to give

Re: What are you reading?

613
Just finished:
The Phantom Carriage (Selma Lagerlöf) - Chose it 'cause of the familiar name, understood that I probably know it from the 1921 movie, comparatively better known (or more watched), it seems. This novel is known in English as Thy Soul Shall Bear Witness. It was written as part of a public-awareness campaign for tuberculosis, so it may not be the most typical work. However, the narration really gets going in setting a ghost story-like mood in the first chapters. I was thinking man, pain is waiting around the corner here. Death really is close. Wails from the underworld seem to float by the words. Ends maybe a little abruptly. Either way, liked + will read more.

Now reading:
Slaughterhouse-Five - I'm into it. That scene where some woman, his sister maybe, is angry, walking around, opening and closing doors, slamming the ice on the table... something incredibly funny about how it was written.

Just started:
Doctor Glas (Hjalmar Söderberg) - Read about 1/3 of this at some earlier time. Leaving things unfinished like that stays in my head and bugs me. Unless they're boring. This one's not.
War of the Worlds - Two chapters, think it's gonna be good. Cool transition from how the first chapter ends, and then you move your eyes to see the words "A star falls" beginning the second chapter - it's unsettling!
born to give

Re: What are you reading?

615
kokorodoko wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2024 6:33 am The library also had the recent autobiography of Britney Spears on display, so what the hell.
In what looks like an amazingly corrupt arrangement, her dad worked together with some businessman whom he was heavily indebted to, who then became co-manager of the conservatorship, earning a percentage of Britney's income. During this time her dad controlled where she went, who she met, what she wore and what she ate. I can't grasp quite how it was possible for things to be set up in this way, it seems her dad managed to convince the court that she suffered from substance abuse and was unstable in other ways, which according to her stemmed from a couple of overblown media stories. But it really looks like an ambush, the way she describes the trial it's like she didn't fully know what was happening - she had been told she wasn't allowed to select her own defense, which turned out to be a lie, and so on.

I'd have wished she'd went into some more depth on the kinds of questions and comments she got from reporters early on, weird stuff about her sexuality and her body. I remember one thing I catched on TV where a reporter asked her "Are you still a virgin?", to which she laughed and answered "Yes" - a troll response, it turns out. The innocent, virginal image was in fact a complete fabrication. She says she felt relieved when Justin Timberlake supposedly outed her as a sexual being, because then she didn't have to pretend anymore.

Justin doesn't look good otherwise. They were basically on the verge of breaking up, he had been cheating, she was advised that she should be the one to break it up so as to not lose face. So she did, but that made her the villain in the eyes of the media and the public. He went on to make mope-songs about how she had been cheating on him. Similar bad advice was presented to her in her later marriage with K-Fed, with similar consequences. Her ex-husband then kept her from seeing her children, which may have precipitated some of her 'scandalous' behaviour.

One of the most wretched parts of celebrity culture is how famous people are on the one hand accorded a kind of moral freedom granted no one else, while at the same time having insane demands of propriety and presentability placed upon them. They are then made into someone whom ordinary people have permission to throw trash at whenever they feel like it, since there is this notion that once you become well-known you automatically sign some contract that makes any expectations of decency and respect not apply. A line of vultures by the roadside, waiting to lunge and hack somebody apart at the sound of a whistle. Although the behaviour is not unique to this sphere, it receives a special kind of sanctification here.

Surprising is how Britney mostly doesn't have anything bad to say about the people she works with. There are a few occasions where she is pressured into doing a show she doesn't want to and such, but there is nothing suggesting that she felt artistically compromised at any point. I read something about how her trademark singing voice was something foisted on her - it's very different from her child voice - but it appears nothing like that happened. She says she thinks her new voice sounded sexy. I think it sounded stupid. But nevermind. At least one point of light in this story.
born to give

Re: What are you reading?

616
kokorodoko wrote: Mon Jul 08, 2024 8:27 am War of the Worlds
Zoomed through it. Structured like a movie. Very good.

Other stuff:
Neuromancer - Re-read in translation. A little bit awkard at first, since the opening passages are so iconic and rendered in an extremely American cadence. The translator appears as someone trying to wrestle themselves into a place where they don't belong and aren't at home. Pretty soon I stopped thinking about it though. In fact it may have helped to strip the text of a certain superficial coolness aura, in a way that does it service. The Sprawl feels like a real place now, not just random pictures from random movies.

Although this future vision is strongly non-utopian, I hesitate to call this a dystopia, since that term to me has something of the fantastic about it. This world by contrast appears mundane and realistic - and is for that reason more depressing, in some ways.

Darkness at Noon - REALLY good.

A Wizard of Earthsea (Ursula Le Guin) - Gripping right from the start.
born to give

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest