Re: Politics

1661
A_Man_Who_Tries wrote: Mon Jul 15, 2024 8:27 am Not like it's going to turn any opinion. If you think the cunt's a hero now, then you did before that.

It's the defining image, they're a news outlet.
Many republicans went on the fence after his first term. Further, there are some very soft-brained people who would be swung by something like this.

As a news organisation they have a choice in the narrative of the stories they cover.

Re: Politics

1663
A_Man_Who_Tries wrote: Mon Jul 15, 2024 8:22 am
Gramsci wrote: Mon Jul 15, 2024 7:18 am Yes. This whole situation is very similar to what happened in Brazil with Bolsonaro. Right down to the assassination attempt. What followed was normalisation of fascism by the media by treating Bozo like a normal candidate.
I can't stand Trump, in case that isn't clear, but I don't see how Time or any other outlet could choose a more suitable image to represent the defining event for their given issue. I'm not speaking about the content - haven't read it, have no idea of any leaning or subtext therein - purely what on earth else would make their cover.
I hate Trump. I want him to lose and go away. I've prayed for heart disease to take him. Objectively, that photo is fucking iconic. Johnny Cash flipping off the camera at Folsom Prison iconic. Nixon with two arms spread with peace signs iconic. People will see it in history books in 2150.

Doesn't change the election, but the image is immortal.

Re: Politics

1664
A_Man_Who_Tries wrote: Mon Jul 15, 2024 6:44 am
andyman wrote: Mon Jul 15, 2024 5:29 am Time are running the photo on their cover? What the fuck?

https://x.com/TIME/status/1812508938639642835
Was there any other option for a cover image this month?
Seems there was…

https://www.threads.net/@vocalnerd/post ... fFyjw1xNuw
clocker bob may 30, 2006 wrote:I think the possibility of interbreeding between an earthly species and an extraterrestrial species is as believable as any other explanation for the existence of George W. Bush.

Re: Politics

1666
andyman wrote: Mon Jul 15, 2024 8:29 am
A_Man_Who_Tries wrote: Mon Jul 15, 2024 8:27 am Not like it's going to turn any opinion. If you think the cunt's a hero now, then you did before that.

It's the defining image, they're a news outlet.
Many republicans went on the fence after his first term. Further, there are some very soft-brained people who would be swung by something like this.

As a news organisation they have a choice in the narrative of the stories they cover.
Somewhere, I saw that Reagan’s approval rating shot up by 22 points after he was shot . . . and then fell back to its normal level a month or two later.

Re: Politics

1667
It's already helping him. That clown judge he appointed in Florida just dismissed his classified documents case. I don't see how some extremely biased hack was appointed to preside over her master's case, but it's emblematic of shitty America 2024.
We're headed for social anarchy when people start pissing on bookstores.

Re: Politics

1668
Gramsci wrote: Mon Jul 15, 2024 9:15 am
A_Man_Who_Tries wrote: Mon Jul 15, 2024 6:44 am
andyman wrote: Mon Jul 15, 2024 5:29 am Time are running the photo on their cover? What the fuck?

https://x.com/TIME/status/1812508938639642835
Was there any other option for a cover image this month?
Seems there was…

https://www.threads.net/@vocalnerd/post ... fFyjw1xNuw
There must have literally been THOUSANDs of images captured during this time in addition to video. The video doesn't lie. After he makes sure he has his Manolos, he realizes he won't get another chance like this one and defiantly starts pumping his fist while they try to usher him off the podium. The Time photo is accurate in capturing the story. Does that improve my opinion of him? No. Would it be disingenuous to use a different picture? Unfortunately, yes, as it is also fabulous propaganda. But again, this is a guy who was not beneath using his mug shot to communicate his agenda.

Re: Politics

1670
jimmy spako wrote: Mon Jul 15, 2024 4:21 am Something like eight minutes go by between the shots and the raised fist. People need to get a grip.
Sorry, CNN said it was something like eight minutes but watching the video now it's something like two. In any case, there was nothing staged about it, aside from the spontaneous opportunistic "self-staging" that is his calling card.

I also think that "Blue MAGA" / Resistance Kool-Aid types are just all in on "Trump is effete", "Trump shits his pants" and whatever other nonsense, wanting it all to be true, when the guy is unfortunately fairly imposing and vital in his own weird way.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests