If we honestly want a viable 3rd party we have to start local! (remember when the German Chancellor was a green?) A serious contender isn't made by running a Nominee every 4 years. To challenge 2 party rule a 3rd party needs to build infrastructure, a NATIONAL network, and develop a coherent plan for governing that entire nation.Gramsci wrote: Wed Jul 24, 2024 4:41 am
Just fucking vote for Harris for fucks sake. It achieves the opposite effect you are aiming for by abstaining or voting Third Party under a ludicrous two party system. You’re not sending anyone a message, you’re helping elect monsters.
Re: Politics
1912I think what we need is a popular, grassroots legislative platform. It would need to be engineered by experts: lawyers, constitutional law scholars, people who have worked within the electoral system, but it would need to be fronted by a charismatic spokesperson. I'm picturing a snappy slogan, stickers, t-shirts, appearances on political commentary shows and late night tv. Basically a viral movement with a game plan that some legislators would be tempted to adopt and turn into a bill because it would appeal to voters who'd be more likely to support them.PASTA wrote: Wed Jul 24, 2024 7:43 amIf we honestly want a viable 3rd party we have to start local! (remember when the German Chancellor was a green?) A serious contender isn't made by running a Nominee every 4 years. To challenge 2 party rule a 3rd party needs to build infrastructure, a NATIONAL network, and develop a coherent plan for governing that entire nation.Gramsci wrote: Wed Jul 24, 2024 4:41 am
Just fucking vote for Harris for fucks sake. It achieves the opposite effect you are aiming for by abstaining or voting Third Party under a ludicrous two party system. You’re not sending anyone a message, you’re helping elect monsters.
It would probably need to change both party funding, and move toward ranked choice voting. One massive hurdle would be overturning Citizens United.
Whatever could be done 2025 would be the year to launch it. Anything but our perennial cycle of this same fucking conversation on an election year followed by a four year break in thinking about it.
Re: Politics
1913Income: 1400$ErickC wrote: Tue Jul 23, 2024 6:55 pm
$1,400 doesn't tell us anything. What is your loan cost? What about your child care? How much does it cost you to get to work? What's your monthly rent?
Rent: 400$
Loan: 300$
Child welfare: 200$
Car cost: 200$
Balance: 300$
You are having it too good to really care about making it a change come election time.ErickC wrote: Tue Jul 23, 2024 6:55 pm I don't quite get what your point is. The far right is a threat to people who work for a living everywhere. Your relative income doesn't change the fact that the GOP's endgame is to make quality of life in the US (and, by extension of their international policy, everywhere else) exponentially worse for everyone but their (white, male) business partners. That doesn't change the fact that people from the "wrong breeding stock" are getting their heads blown off willy nilly by the police in the streets and the GOP intends to make us even more expendable to the state than we already are. This just isn't productive.
That said, going the way of a least fascist guy is always a good way to go. That should be the only benchmark.
Nothing major here. Just a regular EU cock. I pull it out and there is beans all over my penis. Bean shells all over my penis...
Re: Politics
1914Biden addressing the nation tonight at 7 PM CDT.
Anyone think he's about to announce his reason for withdrawing from the race is due to a thus far undisclosed illness?
Anyone think he's about to announce his reason for withdrawing from the race is due to a thus far undisclosed illness?
jason (he/him/his) from volo (illinois)
Re: Politics
1915I doubt it. I think he's just going to make a formal answer that is only "what's best for the country."jfv wrote: Wed Jul 24, 2024 10:28 am Biden addressing the nation tonight at 7 PM CDT.
Anyone think he's about to announce his reason for withdrawing from the race is due to a thus far undisclosed illness?
Re: Politics
1916Agree, and I think to emphasize - true or not - that dropping out was his choice.cakes wrote: Wed Jul 24, 2024 10:47 amI doubt it. I think he's just going to make a formal answer that is only "what's best for the country."jfv wrote: Wed Jul 24, 2024 10:28 am Biden addressing the nation tonight at 7 PM CDT.
Anyone think he's about to announce his reason for withdrawing from the race is due to a thus far undisclosed illness?
Re: Politics
1917Cautiously optimistic about where this is going: Harris skipping Netanyahu address shows daylight with Biden on Israeli leader
Re: Politics
1918I watched Kamala Harris' Wisconsin address last night. I gotta admit, it was refreshing to see a democrat not be stiff and lifeless and to call a spade a spade on Donald Trump. Did anyone else watch? The crowd started changing "Not Going Back" which I think is an awesome antidote to "Make America Great Again."
Last edited by cakes on Wed Jul 24, 2024 12:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Politics
1919this is a great point/idea.losthighway wrote: Wed Jul 24, 2024 8:05 am
I think what we need is a popular, grassroots legislative platform. It would need to be engineered by experts: lawyers, constitutional law scholars, people who have worked within the electoral system, but it would need to be fronted by a charismatic spokesperson. I'm picturing a snappy slogan, stickers, t-shirts, appearances on political commentary shows and late night tv. Basically a viral movement with a game plan that some legislators would be tempted to adopt and turn into a bill because it would appeal to voters who'd be more likely to support them.
It would probably need to change both party funding, and move toward ranked choice voting. One massive hurdle would be overturning Citizens United.
Whatever could be done 2025 would be the year to launch it. Anything but our perennial cycle of this same fucking conversation on an election year followed by a four year break in thinking about it.
On my trip back from the hospital, I was thinking, A third party President with no or very fellow party members in Congress would be able to achieve very little.
Re: Politics
1920I find the US political party structures very weird.
clocker bob may 30, 2006 wrote:I think the possibility of interbreeding between an earthly species and an extraterrestrial species is as believable as any other explanation for the existence of George W. Bush.