Re: Politics
3121The Trump migrant crisis has about as much merit as Reagan's welfare queen.
We're headed for social anarchy when people start pissing on bookstores.
Taxes increases on the wealthy tend to work if you frame it as “adjustment” of putting normal people’s taxes down while raising them on specific wealth. Make it something everyone hates like stock dividends or hedge fund profits.enframed wrote: Wed Nov 06, 2024 9:30 amIt's become increasingly obvious that increased taxes on the wealthy do not appeal to the lower income earners. IMO, this is because they somehow think they could also be wealthy someday. The American Dream is to become part of the 1%, yet so many seem to think they can do it. It's a math problem.Gramsci wrote: Wed Nov 06, 2024 9:12 am They should have done a mea culpa-ish on inflation and had a clear program to reduce grocery bills BEFORE the election. They could have cut taxes on household goods and increased taxes on wealth. That’s a big splashy “We’re on your side” policy.
clocker bob may 30, 2006 wrote:I think the possibility of interbreeding between an earthly species and an extraterrestrial species is as believable as any other explanation for the existence of George W. Bush.
I think this is everything honestly, with the influencer-sphere, this fallacy gets even worse. As the American dream is no longer a Suburban Ranch with a white picket fence, but a McMansion with a wrought-iron gate.enframed wrote: Wed Nov 06, 2024 9:30 amIt's become increasingly obvious that increased taxes on the wealthy do not appeal to the lower income earners. IMO, this is because they somehow think they could also be wealthy someday. The American Dream is to become part of the 1%, yet so many seem to think they can do it. It's a math problem.Gramsci wrote: Wed Nov 06, 2024 9:12 am They should have done a mea culpa-ish on inflation and had a clear program to reduce grocery bills BEFORE the election. They could have cut taxes on household goods and increased taxes on wealth. That’s a big splashy “We’re on your side” policy.
Somehow the lower classes have continued to buy into trickle-down Reaganomics bullshit like it will be manna from heaven. We wouldn't be here without ol' Ron.enframed wrote: Wed Nov 06, 2024 9:30 amIt's become increasingly obvious that increased taxes on the wealthy do not appeal to the lower income earners. IMO, this is because they somehow think they could also be wealthy someday. The American Dream is to become part of the 1%, yet so many seem to think they can do it. It's a math problem.Gramsci wrote: Wed Nov 06, 2024 9:12 am They should have done a mea culpa-ish on inflation and had a clear program to reduce grocery bills BEFORE the election. They could have cut taxes on household goods and increased taxes on wealth. That’s a big splashy “We’re on your side” policy.
I guess since we're forced to think about this shit now, him and Musk will not get along and that situation will implode. I'm not even sure Trump is crazy about a lot of the Project 2025 ideas either so that'll be a battle of dumb and dumber too.Wood Goblin wrote: Wed Nov 06, 2024 9:51 am The only hopeful things keeping me going this morning are that . . .
You can't blame people for buying it when neither side presents an alternative. Popular political/ economic discourse has changed very little in the last 40 years. They still routinely wheel out the household budget/ credit card shit. What can you expect?Krev wrote:Somehow the lower classes have continued to buy into trickle-down Reaganomics bullshit like it will be manna from heaven. We wouldn't be here without ol' Ron.
The vultures waiting to tear apart the ACA with help from a complicit SCOTUS fills me with dread. The Trumpies with pre-existing conditions maybe didn't stop to consider what a post-ACA country would look like.penningtron wrote: Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:03 amI guess since we're forced to think about this shit now, him and Musk will not get along and that situation will implode. I'm not even sure Trump is crazy about a lot of the Project 2025 ideas either so that'll be a battle of dumb and dumber too.Wood Goblin wrote: Wed Nov 06, 2024 9:51 am The only hopeful things keeping me going this morning are that . . .
Oh, and if it wasn't obvious, RFK Jr. was being played so it'll be funny watching him being dumped faster than Sarah Palin. (or like a bear carcass in Central Park..)
But that's where the popcorn eating ends. Deporting even a fraction of the people proposed is not only morally horrible, but will completely tank the economy.
Don't worry, they're going to replace it with something BETTER!!!kicker_of_elves wrote: Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:10 amThe vultures waiting to tear apart the ACA with help from a complicit SCOTUS fills me with dread. The Trumpies with pre-existing conditions maybe didn't stop to consider what a post-ACA country would look like.penningtron wrote: Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:03 amI guess since we're forced to think about this shit now, him and Musk will not get along and that situation will implode. I'm not even sure Trump is crazy about a lot of the Project 2025 ideas either so that'll be a battle of dumb and dumber too.Wood Goblin wrote: Wed Nov 06, 2024 9:51 am The only hopeful things keeping me going this morning are that . . .
Oh, and if it wasn't obvious, RFK Jr. was being played so it'll be funny watching him being dumped faster than Sarah Palin. (or like a bear carcass in Central Park..)
But that's where the popcorn eating ends. Deporting even a fraction of the people proposed is not only morally horrible, but will completely tank the economy.
Return to “General Discussion”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests