Re: What are you reading?
741Leigh on Leigh.
"And the light, it burns your skin...in a language you don't understand."
I wouldn't say terrible. It's not unreadable because of annoyance or boredom. But there is a lot of blablabla. I'm halfway into the first book now and most of it has just been dialogues about something that is happening somewhere else.El Protoolio wrote: Thu Dec 19, 2024 5:29 pmMy only problem with Asimov, as it is with Clark and, this is a controversial opinion and will trigger some folks mainly fm Mike Upchurch, Frank Herbert, is that they are all terrible writers. Cool stories, other than Herbert, but absolutely terrible writing.
Marx on Bonaparte/French Revolution sounds really interesting. Is it a dense read?
Not necessarily - it’s beautifully written and though of a certain era it’s not terribly heady, like Kapital definitely was. Though it’s like anything, I think if I were more intimately familiar with the French Revolution I would get more out of it.losthighway wrote: Tue Dec 31, 2024 7:31 amMarx on Bonaparte/French Revolution sounds really interesting. Is it a dense read?
I felt the same way. I’ve never read David Copperfield, so a lot of the parallels were lost on me. It just felt a little too out-of-touch or something.losthighway wrote: Tue Dec 31, 2024 4:25 pm I've been reading Demon Copperhead by Barbara Kingsolver. It was recommended by coworkers and contextualized as an antidote to the phony Hillbilly Elegy. The David Copperfield parallels were interesting. Three fourths through it's feeling good not great. Oddly, the stuff I'm really on board with is less satisfying in fiction form. Like the opioid epidemic. She's sharing a true phenomenon but at some points I feel like I see through the fourth wall and can see her thinking "and here I'll help people understand this about Appalachia!". It makes me just want to read more nonfiction about the labor struggles of coal miners.
Return to “General Discussion”
Users browsing this forum: penningtron and 0 guests