jeff fox wrote: Mon Jan 13, 2025 8:18 am
I've never heard a single fan of steely dan talk about 'studio perfection' or the quality of the recordings. Not one. Yet that's 100% of what their detractors talk about. Where the fuck did this come from? I love the songs. Just say you don't like the songs. Same goes with Pavement- "they're Ivy League slackers, durrrrr". The fuck does that even mean? Just admit you've read a bunch of press about them and MAYBE heard a total of 5 songs.
SD could've been recorded by Spot and I'd still love them.
(Flipper has 1.5 albums worth of perfect. the rest is shit.)
If only detractors point to alleged perfection of Steely Dan, then why do 'audiophiles' use Aja, Gaucho and The Nightfly to test new gear? It's not because they're huge fans. There absolutely is the perception that these records are perfect, and that's a product of their production.
I really like Pavement, and played a bunch of shows w/ them a really long time ago. Mark tried out for an old band I was in shortly before he got the SY gig. There's nothing you could say about Pavement that would make me think they aren't exceptional.
Full Disclosure: I've memorized The Nightfly and must have listened to/sang along to it a thousand times. Steely Dan? I appreciate the parts, but the whole often fall flat for me, though I have a real soft spot for Fagan's lyrics and phrasing (that fucker can actually sing). The Nightfly is probably a desert island disc for me.
I like Zappa too, but he was very similar in his desire to break musicians. There's a lot of musicians out there who crushed people's wills as part of the process.
...wasn't spot a world famous rocket engineer?