Re: Politics

3711
This is the precursor to red-staters rounding up intellectuals and burying them alive in pits. The Holiday in Cambodia is coming.
Last edited by Krev on Thu Jan 23, 2025 9:59 am, edited 1 time in total.
We're headed for social anarchy when people start pissing on bookstores.

Re: Politics

3712
penningtron wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 9:21 am The letter that went out to gov't employees yesterday about snitching on DEI sympathizers is equal parts :roll: and "pack up a car and head to the Canadian border". The high school level threats are hard to take seriously, but the intent behind it is serious,1930s-ish weed-out-the-intellectuals stuff. I'm not sure there's legal grounding behind any of it, but right now they're just trying to intimidate and exhaust people into quitting or retiring.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white- ... rcna188871
How can it be proven in any single case that someone was a "DEI" hire? Serious question. Seems near impossible. I doubt it says that anywhere in anyone's personnel file. Talk about wasteful...

I'm not suggesting people should not be worried, but it just seems soooo ridiculous.
Last edited by enframed on Thu Jan 23, 2025 10:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
Records + CDs for sale

Re: Politics

3713
The "theatrics of doing." A lot of damage could be done. A lot of damage has already been done. Who knows what's to follow? But these orders and policies are indeed a way of deflecting from the inevitable roadblocks ahead, the stagnation/malaise to follow when it turns out the quality of most people's lives hasn't improved under Trumpism 2.0.
ZzzZzzZzzz . . .

New Novel.

Re: Politics

3714
enframed wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 9:59 am How can it be proven in any single case that someone was a "DEI" hire? Serious question. Seems near impossible. I doubt it says that anywhere in anyone's personnel file. Talk about wasteful...
I think it's more they're going after departments that enforce DEI regulations, which there were a few. It's possible, knowing that this was coming 2 months ago, that these people moved around to avoid this purge, and now the clueless shitheads in charge are asking for snitches to rat them out.
"There will be no adverse consequences for timely reporting this information," the email said.
I'm not a poker person but isn't this a tell? If they had any clue of what agencies did and how they were structured they wouldn't need this snitch bitch hotline.
Music
Drums

Re: Politics

3717
Wood Goblin wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 10:19 am
Krev wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 10:17 am https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbcnew ... rcna188938

Mississippi is the third world.
This is a Democrat trolling Republicans.
I really hope you're right. That would be fucking amazing. Ten grand fine for the third time caught.
Last edited by Krev on Thu Jan 23, 2025 10:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
We're headed for social anarchy when people start pissing on bookstores.

Re: Politics

3719
penningtron wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 10:05 am
enframed wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2025 9:59 am How can it be proven in any single case that someone was a "DEI" hire? Serious question. Seems near impossible. I doubt it says that anywhere in anyone's personnel file. Talk about wasteful...
I think it's more they're going after departments that enforce DEI regulations, which there were a few. It's possible, knowing that this was coming 2 months ago, that these people moved around to avoid this purge, and now the clueless shitheads in charge are asking for snitches to rat them out.
"There will be no adverse consequences for timely reporting this information," the email said.
I'm not a poker person but isn't this a tell? If they had any clue of what agencies did and how they were structured they wouldn't need this snitch bitch hotline.
This should completely be weaponized against them. “Snitch” on Trump supporters and force them to sit through a humiliating review (or worse). Fuck them.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests