FYPFY. You understand that people are being 'detained' for rhetoric like this, I'm sure. You're consistently calling for violence and use loose, reckless rhetoric - yet if someone uses prose you don't like, you jump their shit.
Re: Politics
3882I don’t care about what prose people use, I care about the truth and recognizing reality and the consequences that are unfolding as a result. We had a pages long argument about whether or not Musk was a Nazi and with people remaining unconvinced and then *of course* he appears on video for a German far-right party and talks about getting past the shame of the Holocaust and people *still* won’t admit they were wrong. It’s beyond frustratingAttackChimp wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 10:56 amFYPFY. You understand that people are being 'detained' for rhetoric like this, I'm sure. You're consistently calling for violence and use loose, reckless rhetoric - yet if someone uses prose you don't like, you jump their shit.
Re: Politics
3883Also, once again more pearls clutched on my calling for violence *against the very people in power who are currently USING violence on people like me and my entire community and other marginalized people and getting away with it*. We would be satisfied if they simply stopped lying about us, oppressing, and killing us. They won’t be satisfied until people like me are completely eradicated. We aren’t the fucking same.
Re: Politics
3884If you are calling for violence, and aren't qualified to use it, that makes you a hypocrite. Maga are also hypocrites. Square that circle for me.
Pearl clutching. Cute.
Re: Politics
3885On the calls for violence (regardless of the target): remember that this message board is affiliated with a business, okay? If memory serves me right, that used to be an automatic ban.
Re: Politics
3886Pretty sure Steve wrote a song about the waste of time violence is...Wood Goblin wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 11:35 am On the calls for violence (regardless of the target): remember that this message board is affiliated with a business, okay? If memory serves me right, that used to be an automatic ban.
Re: Politics
3887Is it OK to recommend a teensy bit of violence towards towards white supremacists, Nazis, Proud Boys, Oath Keepers, law enforcement, etc when met with having to defend your physical safety? Like, is it OK to stand your ground?
Justice for Randall Adjessom, Javion Magee, Destinii Hope, Kelaia Turner, Dexter Wade and Nakari Campbell
Re: Politics
3888Self defense isn't violence.
'Stand your ground' is not self defense, in many states. To say that differently, in 22 states of the union, you can't proactively defend yourself.
I'm pretty sure Chicago isn't a stand your ground city.
'Stand your ground' is not self defense, in many states. To say that differently, in 22 states of the union, you can't proactively defend yourself.
I'm pretty sure Chicago isn't a stand your ground city.
Re: Politics
3889OK then I'll just wait.
Justice for Randall Adjessom, Javion Magee, Destinii Hope, Kelaia Turner, Dexter Wade and Nakari Campbell
Re: Politics
3890Who determines who is “qualified” to use violence? I want to use it to protect my life and my loved ones and other trans people from extermination. Maga wants to use it to exterminate people like me and forcibly remove the bodily autonomy of people when it comes to their sex and reproduction. If you look at these two instances and equate, then I’m sorry, but I think you’re a fucking piece of shit.AttackChimp wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 11:28 amIf you are calling for violence, and aren't qualified to use it, that makes you a hypocrite. Maga are also hypocrites. Square that circle for me.
Pearl clutching. Cute.