Krev wrote: Mon Nov 25, 2024 9:21 am It seems like it was picked up as a buzzword by right-wing chuds before it even began. The word (and idea) itself isn't crap, obviously.

This nails it, for me.

joelb wrote: Mon Dec 02, 2024 1:50 pm It's useful in the current U.S. context in that it signals something more about the speaker's character than the speaker can comprehend.

On this topic, I think "based" takes first prize for neologisms that are meaningless without the context of the speaker's alignment. It can be used to refer to anyone from Bernie Sanders to Donald Trump, and depending on who says it and what they mean, it can refer to any ideas or actions ranging from Ed Norton curbstomping that kid to Ed Norton getting woke and rejecting the skinheads. It's fucking meaningless.

jimmy spako wrote: Mon Dec 02, 2024 3:31 am I would like to be swolke, i.e. both swoll and woke.

salut

ChudFusk wrote: Tue Dec 03, 2024 8:33 pm

joelb wrote: Mon Dec 02, 2024 1:50 pm It's useful in the current U.S. context in that it signals something more about the speaker's character than the speaker can comprehend.

On this topic, I think "based" takes first prize for neologisms that are meaningless without the context of the speaker's alignment. It can be used to refer to anyone from Bernie Sanders to Donald Trump, and depending on who says it and what they mean, it can refer to any ideas or actions ranging from Ed Norton curbstomping that kid to Ed Norton getting woke and rejecting the skinheads. It's fucking meaningless.

the basedgod should have set the task force on those weirdos when they started doing that shit

What the dickheads really define woke and DEI as is “anti-white,” and this is why they can’t (won’t) define it out loud.

Being aware of/awake to your personal and society’s bullshit is a great thing. Race, sex, gender, class, more.

Edit: also anti-cis-straight, whatever amorphous thing they define at that moment as “normal.” This will change as it suits them in the moment.

Frank Decent wrote: Tue Dec 03, 2024 7:09 pm

Krev wrote: Mon Nov 25, 2024 9:21 am It seems like it was picked up as a buzzword by right-wing chuds before it even began. The word (and idea) itself isn't crap, obviously.

This nails it, for me.

And me.

bumble wrote: Sun Dec 15, 2024 4:02 pm What the dickheads really define woke and DEI as is “anti-white,” and this is why they can’t (won’t) define it out loud.

In addition to always changing the meaning of a word they can't define. It's woke if there is a black mermaid, then it's woke if black creatives create black stories centering on a black mermaid. It's easier to say one just isn't a fan of black people but they choose to jump through hoops to justify their racism.

At it’s very best it’s about caring about others and being curious about things you don’t understand about other races, sexual preferences, etc. (i.e. the quick dismissal of Kendrick Lamar’s halftime show by white people, many of whom are liberal without poking around the ‘nternets to learn what “Not Like Us” and the whole performance was about)

At it’s most nauseating is going way over the line to be prickishly sanctimonious (i.e. “Lost Lake” in Logan Square was once a kickass little tiki bar with great drinks and a genuine escapist vibe. That was until a new owner decided that the term tiki was *cultural appropriation and changed the drink names such as “Beachcomber”, “Hulu Skirt”, “Bali Hi” to non-tiki names, tore down the idols and the puffer fish in netting, and SUCKED ALL THE FUCKING FUN OUT OF ONE OF OUR FAVORITE BARS )

Lost Lake closed over 3 years due to the pandemic. Good grief, man.

We raise our flamed bowling shirts in its memory.

This might be Boyd Rice’s fault but I associate tiki bar culture with single middle-aged sex tourists