Can you fault someone for hoping The State could actually be the antidote to wealth inequality? I don't know that answer to that, and can't really see issues like this clearly. I'm probably as woefully unaware of what Socialism actually looks like, because frankly I'm distrustful of inorganic systems. I also probably don't have a fully fleshed-out understanding of Socialism on an ideological level. I feel like The State as inoculant against oppression is Communism.Gramsci wrote: Sat Mar 01, 2025 4:02 pm He does fall into a bit of a common trap of having a very restricted understanding of socialism. That of socialism as “The State”, rather than socialism as workplace democracy and cooperative ownership. Markets and business exist outside of capitalist ownership structures. There’s nothing to say we can’t have cooperatively owned businesses competing against one another parallel to a social democratic public realm.. The problem with the current system is exploitation not competition or even markets.
I do sympathize with the idea that Laws are for us, to be used against centralized power. Also IMO, property law perverts the laws of life and limb. It's an incongruent belief for someone who professes to be a Utopian Anarchist, but here I am in all my crapulence. I figure, we'll eventually get there if we try.