Wood Goblin wrote: Thu Mar 19, 2026 2:25 pm
I just saw a headline about how Crypto.com is laying of 12% of its workforce because they’re embracing AI.
Can you imagine a headline more revolting? One that manages to trigger every irritation-node in your brain?
“Area TikTok Personality Doxxed by Angry Frank Zappa Cover Band”
“Flash Mob Descends on Eagles Concert at the Sphere”
“Noted Think-fluencer Uses Terms ‘Iconic,’ ‘Curated,’ and ‘Fire’ to Describe Drake Spotify Playlist”
I left crypto for ed tech, but while I was looking, there was hard recruiting for web 3.0 (which is crypto/blockchain). It felt like something was going to pop there.
But on the other hand, even my work is embracing AI and we just finished a 2 week hackathon where we used AI to build all kinds of cool shit. One thing we learned from this is that AI can code, sure, but it can't replace a software engineer. First, who's going to build the software? You have to tell AI what to build and how to build it. And then there's time. But more importantly, having the skill for undersetanding software development is still very relevant. Vibe coded production software is just a bomb waiting to explode. However, I can see AI helping engineer teams in a sense, in that it's really great for small teams, like the one I'm on, but for large engineering companies, who have the profits and the funds to hire more engineers than they need, is the area is where the shave off is going to occur. It's a little alarming, because those are places where they foster engineers and with that, improvements in engineering, that help engineers as a whole and improve engineering in general. So we may lose out on this, because AI doesn't come up with new ideas, it's only as good as the most current ideas. I'm curious as to where this goes...
But crypto is also getting it's ass handed to it. Bitcoin is down $40k in the last year.