shagboy wrote:cursedby11 wrote:you know whats ironic about indie music? There's nothing really independent about it anymore.
not so. "indie" doesn't describe a sound, although it can pass for that sometimes. it describes an existence that does not rely upon the money or organizations of the major corporate players of the industry.
so if you say that there's nothing independent about indie music, then you must be thinking of something other than indie music. indie music is by definition independent.
Yeah, but colloquially, people use the term to define a sound culture that is now co-opted (for the most part). Not as an economic or financial condition. The term is tired, and most "independent" rock wouldn't be considered "indie".
If there's a metal band that makes no money, and sounds like Poison, they are technically "indie" but no one would say that.
I'm so excited to see someone else making this point, that is just so obvious... What makes labels like Matador and Sub Pop indie? To me, they're just other companies. Maybe their CEO's wear cool "indie" clothes and skate around on skateboards. I dunno. I duncare. They're not indie. Not when they
depend on media conglomerates like MTV and late night talk shows on the big TV networks to push their noise.
Indie died in 1991. RIP. As soon as DGC and Atlantic moved in, it was all over. There were still great indie bands, but they had no hope of making money unless they sounded like Pearl Jam or Nirvana.
"Alternative" is another word that is pure crapola. It's completely meaningless. I mean, I hear that U2 are alternative. So basically, alternative is defined by what it's not -- it's not R&B, metal, hip-hop, fusion... It's a rock-like thing, but the musicians wear neat-o clothes.
SHIT SHIT SHIT! I hate it! Fuck "indie". Fuck "alternative". It's a complete crock of shit and has been for years.