Most terrifying weapon

21
uk_chris wrote:it would be perfrctly possible to program nanites to target a specific ethnic group as the dna of each ethnic group has certain markers that seperate them from the rest of the planet. the problem is that many people will carry markers for ethnic groups contrary to what the believe to be their own. i for example appear white european, but im actually part dutch, part anglo saxon, and part zulu though if i didn't know i was adopted i would never know i was mixed race. therefor i wouldn't know i carried those markers.

a truely scary application for this technology would be if it were programed to replicate itself. this would lead to the destruction of all life on earth, before the planet itself is turned into one big floating ball of nanites (grey goo theory).

the way in which this technology works is that it rearanges things at the sub atomic level. you could literaly thow some nanites into a bath tub full of wood, and if given the right commands they could turn that wood into gold, all by rearranging the molecules.

this technology is very real, and we're only a few decades away from it being more than just applied science in a lab. fucking scary.


I agree... I've always read the differences between DNA in men, women, and other races are the same as the differences between any two people.

Meaning, two white guys can have as much difference in DNA as a white guy and a Filipino woman.

What phenotypic trait is specifically "white"? Even "black" people can have very fair and white skin.

The devil is in the details... It seems feasible, but DNA isn't as neat and tidy as we might think... DNA doesn't correlate to the human conception of "race"... This is an abstraction that we as humans have imposed on ourselves...

I think it would be funny it "whitey" did invent such a weapon, and 20% of white people died, because they're not as white as they thought they were.

OK, I'm going to pierce my nipples and go drop some acid in Death Valley... Later!

Most terrifying weapon

22
Linus Van Pelt wrote:
ebeam wrote:
uk_chris wrote:
the way in which this technology works is that it rearanges things at the sub atomic level. you could literaly thow some nanites into a bath tub full of wood, and if given the right commands they could turn that wood into gold, all by rearranging the molecules.


Michael Crichton fantasies aside, this technology doesn't exist. This is alchemy and isn't even really in the realm of nanotechnology. There are major, and I mean MAJOR, hurdles to overcome before you see any practical 'nanobots' and for these we're talking about manipulation of individual atoms and molecules, not neutrons and protons, etc.

There are already examples of products in the marketplace that use nanotechnology and there will be many more in the coming years. There will certainly be some practical NEMS (nano electromechanical systems) available, but they will most certainly be more mundane that what you see in science fiction.


Naysayer!!!

ZAP!

(ebeam) =>
Image


I heard Linus Van Pelt's penis is an example of nano technology...

Most terrifying weapon

23
yut wrote:I heard Linus Van Pelt's penis is an example of nano technology...



HI-OHHHH!!!!


my vote is for guns. people can hide them in their clothes and then pull one out and blow-blow-blow, you hit the ground, dead as a god

or is that dog? doornail?

anyways. guns don't exist yet, thankfully.
that damned fly wrote:digital is fine for a couple things. clocks, for example.

and mashups

Most terrifying weapon

25
Rimbaud III wrote:A Ferarri that used to be Augusto Pinochet, eh? I'm not sure that's very cool. I'd sooner just ride around on his back slapping his head every now and then.


You need not worry. I'm sure that any dictator to sports car conversion would end up in the hands of those fat cats in washington.

Most terrifying weapon

29
Michael Crichton fantasies aside, this technology doesn't exist. This is alchemy and isn't even really in the realm of nanotechnology. There are major, and I mean MAJOR, hurdles to overcome before you see any practical 'nanobots' and for these we're talking about manipulation of individual atoms and molecules, not neutrons and protons, etc.



granted you are quite right. the technology will probably never reach such science fiction levels within our life time. however, the theory is totaly sound. what is stopping us is our inability to make such complicated calculations at the sub-atomic level.
one day (assuming we haven't blown ourselves to pieces before then) this technology will be a reality at those science fiction levels, maybe not for ten's of generations, but it will exist.

advances in stem cell research (now that they have found the existance of stem cells in the hairs at the back of the nose, far less a sticky ethical debate), and the work of scientists in australia on breaking down matter in to it's constituent particles and then putting it back together again (as in beam me up scotty style) are advancing our understanding of the building blocks of the universe on a daily basis.

i doubt that many of us alive today will see the benefits of this research within our life times. the degree to which we understand, or can implicate this technology is what is in question here.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest