small ass guitar
Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2004 4:04 pm
Yes, I'm afraid the Crichton fantasies are still very much fiction at this point. The approach he takes in that book and some of the science is pretty legit, but we are nowhere near that point. For the most part, this technology is really in its infancy. A lot of energy is going into simply (well, not that simple really) fabricating structures and studying their properties. The approach taken in the Crichton book is what is considered a bottom-up approach, where you basically start with individual atoms/molecules and get them to fit together in certain ways. In the book, they use genetically engineered bacteria to produce the molecules, which is already a common way to produce lots of things (eg. insulin). However, once you've got the molecules you're interested in the hard part is getting them to assemble into the desired structures and then integrating them with other systems.
I think you will see nanotechnology widespread as a supplement to already existing technologies in the near future (10+ years) - there is already quite a bit of this going on. However, if you're waiting for nanotechnology to supplant existing technologies for applications in electronics, etc. you'll probably be old and gray (or dead) if/when it happens.
I think you will see nanotechnology widespread as a supplement to already existing technologies in the near future (10+ years) - there is already quite a bit of this going on. However, if you're waiting for nanotechnology to supplant existing technologies for applications in electronics, etc. you'll probably be old and gray (or dead) if/when it happens.