toomanyhelicopters wrote:
are there people out there who can't listen to music, but rather have to listen to production value?
I'd like to know how you separate the two. Surely the experience of all types of music and the emotional response it evokes is bound up in its production?
it's really easy for me to separate the two. granted, if the production is *so terrible* that it's impossible to pick out the instruments being played and what they're doing, sure, you can't listen to the music. but whereas most normal joe average humans don't listen to production at all, don't even understand what it means, and don't know how to listen to the music even (only the "beat" and the vocals), there are also people who are so completely in tune with the production aspect that an album that is poorly recorded is completely unlistenable to them. i've found this, in my limited experience, to generally be the case with people with extremely expensive and kick-ass hifi systems.
for example, my roommate listens to music on a boombox that's a little bigger than the size of a toaster. it cannot reproduce any recording with any semblance of accuracy. he listens to a lot of tapes, too. production value means absolutely nothing to him. he only listens to the music.
then there are the exact opposite end of the spectrum, people who, as they've said here, will buy and listen to an album where they don't really like the music, but rather they're listening to the production element.
i understand your question, but i don't think music is always taken on an emotional level. i can't speak for anyone else on this, but for me, some stuff certainly evokes an emotional response, but other stuff is much more about a cerebral response. different music affects me differently. i think that for me at least, it's very easy to separate the music from the production. and i can listen to stuff with good music, regardless of good or bad production. but i personally can't listen to bad music just because it has good production. i mean, i can, but i won't.