Interested in Analog Recording
Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 4:03 pm
There are a huge amount of people that claim digital recording has now surpassed analogue in terms of accuracy and fidelity.
Most of the time they are more than willing to back that up with graphs and technical data sheets explaining exactly how a format that basically teleports the sound from the converter to your speakers is superior to a an outdated format that records music in a linear fashion.
Pinch of salt, analogue is still king. Dig is good and even adequate for what I do but what I am hearing from a 16-track 2" is not just favourable harmonic distortion, it's recording music in a linear way with no need for reconstruction from 1's and 0's from a hard drive.
It's not the be all and end all but to me analogue tape (done well, there is a huge amount of room for error) is still THE BEST sonically.
Most of the time they are more than willing to back that up with graphs and technical data sheets explaining exactly how a format that basically teleports the sound from the converter to your speakers is superior to a an outdated format that records music in a linear fashion.
Pinch of salt, analogue is still king. Dig is good and even adequate for what I do but what I am hearing from a 16-track 2" is not just favourable harmonic distortion, it's recording music in a linear way with no need for reconstruction from 1's and 0's from a hard drive.
It's not the be all and end all but to me analogue tape (done well, there is a huge amount of room for error) is still THE BEST sonically.