Angus Jung wrote:

6-4-3 wrote:
I'm an Independent.

So is Bill O'Reilly.

I'm sure there are hundreds, thousands of soldiers over there that would love nothing more than to pull your insides out through your asshole for characterizing what they are doing as "Shit."

6-4-3 wrote:"...this shit." ?????

WTF back at you.

I'm sure there are hundreds, thousands of soldiers over there that would love nothing more than to pull your insides out through your asshole for characterizing what they are doing as "Shit."

actually, a lot of them think it's shit.

Soldiers from around the globe are serving honorably (despite your opinion) for the eventual freedom of a country mired in misery for decades upon decades. Say what you want about the collective motive, but don't broad-stroke your bias and assert it towards what brave men and women are doing in Iraq - doing what you would seemingly never consider doing yourself, by the way.

Yeah I would never consider dying for Bush's mistake built on lies and deception. By the way bush's dad and his pals helped keep this fuck in power from the beginning knowing full well the evil of his empire. Maybe Bush can can bring out his dad's coke empire fueled money to pay for this blunder too.

Rather, use your uninformed eyes to look over those liberal-shaded spectacles for a moment and try acknowledging what a difference these soldiers are making. Making for the OVERWHELMING majority of people who welcome just the faintest glimpse at freedom, democracy and a life that doesn't include the possibility of having themselves and their family members dropped into a shredder because they took a dump at the wrong time of day.

Here is your biggest mistake. The morality of freedom was never given as the reason for going there. Hussein's supposed WMD's and ties to Ossama were. Not one Iraqi was on those twin tower planes. You would be surprised how many FOX news watchers think this! If morality was a factor, we would have been in Sudan when the mass slaughters began there. The Bush family and neo-conservatieves only gives a rats ass about democracy if there is something to be gained for it. By the way, freedom in Iraq must mean to you years of civil war, further destabilization of the region, more terrorism, alienating turkey, more $ for the oil companies, etc.....

There's a whole wide world of information out there beyond CNN, Michael Moore and Dan Rather, friend. Tap into it. Then maybe you'll see what the mainstream isn't feeding you. That people in Iraq can't wait to be free - and not a single one of them gives one rat's peanuty shit whether or not there were weapons of mass destruction in their country or not.

Fuck you. CNN is mediocre at best, Michael Moore's 911 was weak and not as biting as it could have been, and Dan Rather and his ilk have a serious bias to the left. You are the misguided dunce with the blinders on. Once again, we were never there to free anybody.

Big pictures are so often easy to see, but hard to understand - for some.

Like You

6-4-3 wrote:Soldiers from around the globe are serving honorably (despite your opinion) for the eventual freedom of a country mired in misery for decades upon decades.

capnreverb wrote:The truth is not left or right, but it's there.

Intern_8033 wrote:So what's happening with our administration/country seems to be pretty much on par with human behavior throughout recorded history. Throwing our bodies in front of the train will slow it down, but it's going to get where it wants to go.

I hope that doesn't sound callous or insensitive.