Page 2 of 15

Band: Nirvana

Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 10:05 am
by Peripatetic_Archive
MajorEverettMiller wrote:I did a little research on the internets.

I wasn't aware that Courtney Love's husband had a band. That's crazy!

Do they sound anything like Hole? 'Cause I'm a big fan of Hole (gnarf gnarf.)


They don't really sound like Hole, but they sound a lot like Bush.

Especially Razorblade Suitcase.

If it's In Utero you're talking about.

Band: Nirvana

Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 10:17 am
by Brett Eugene Ralph_Archive
I may be a Buddhist, but I have yet to "enter" Nirvana. I just don't get it. Then again, I'm no Pixies fan either.

Yawn.

Band: Nirvana

Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 10:22 am
by tommydski_Archive
this was their best album imho -

Image

Band: Nirvana

Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 10:47 am
by miseryandthesun_Archive
MajorEverettMiller wrote:I've never heard this band. What do they sound like?

Recommend an album that I should download.


Bleach is the only Nirvana album that I can stomach. Parts of it are really neat! (Paper Cuts, anyone?)

I vote Crap with a WF 1 for a handful of songs on Bleach.

I would love for someone to explain, in a good amount of detail, how they could justify voting otherwise.

Most justifications I hear actually sound a lot like this one:

thepcs wrote:of course i was 14 when Nirvana got popular so there's no wonder i liked it. rrraaarrrgghhh ANGST!

also seeing them play was what inspired me to play the drums.


If I were to argue that Oingo Boingo was a respectable band because they inspired me to play the xylophone or because "Little Girls" was usually on repeat while I tried on my mother's lingerie as a little boy, it wouldn't be long before someone pointed out that my argument was very silly.

I could argue that Oingo Boingo was a band that I enjoyed listening to when I was young and stupid.

I could not argue that it was a respectable band.

Please explain to me what makes Nirvana a respectable band.

Band: Nirvana

Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 10:50 am
by punch_the_lion_Archive
Yeah but Nirvana were at least an infinitely more credible and listenable band than Oingo Boingo. I disagree with your comparison. I don't think they are particularly distinguished but wrote and performed some solid songs with decent musicianship. There are plenty worse to be criticized.

Band: Nirvana

Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 11:05 am
by Major_Archive
miseryandthesun wrote:If I were to argue that Oingo Boingo was a respectable band because they inspired me to play the xylophone or because "Little Girls" was usually on repeat while I tried on my mother's lingerie as a little boy, it wouldn't be long before someone pointed out that my argument was very silly.


Say waaaahh??

Band: Nirvana

Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 11:28 am
by placeholder_Archive
I've always thought they were pretty boring. CRAP. Waffle Factor of 2 for a couple of catchy songs, I guess. I don't understand the reverence for this band.

Band: Nirvana

Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 11:34 am
by The Code is Almighty_Archive
NOT CRAP

Nirvana was the gateway drug. I'd still be getting REM and TLC cd's for Christmas if Nirvana hadn't found me.

Band: Nirvana

Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 11:46 am
by tommydski_Archive
what's wrong with rem?

:shock:

Band: Nirvana

Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 11:50 am
by kerble_Archive
tommydski wrote:what's wrong with rem?

:shock:


can't spell "ream some dude in the ass" without rem.