data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3397/b33978f603cc04bbd57875c69d74dc0752ea7b51" alt="Image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f6b8/5f6b828228f6af4f199550ae72b6e79963d15c00" alt="Image"
The most massive carbon footprint of any primitive cabin ever, I guess!gonzochicago wrote: Tue Dec 07, 2021 3:12 pm100%. Yep! Let's just say the land is paid in full already, which is fucking nuts.tommy wrote: Already stated on FB, but this is awesome.
Also sorta wondering if this has all been made possible because of the cryptocurrency thread.
gonzochicago wrote: Doubling down on life, I guess you could say.
Really. loljeff fox wrote: Wed Dec 15, 2021 4:29 pm The most massive carbon footprint of any primitive cabin ever, I guess!
Out of interest, would there be any way of calculating this? Having a unit number attached to the cost would be handy to have as a rough guide for scale.
If it can be done, and assuming you're talking about the carbon footprint of mining cryptocurrancy, can we also compare it to the offset of not having a kid(s).A_Man_Who_Tries wrote: Thu Dec 16, 2021 10:26 amOut of interest, would there be any way of calculating this? Having a unit number attached to the cost would be handy to have as a rough guide for scale.
I smell a thunderdome...tommy wrote: Thu Dec 16, 2021 1:03 pmIf it can be done, and assuming you're talking about the carbon footprint of mining cryptocurrancy, can we also compare it to the offset of not having a kid(s).A_Man_Who_Tries wrote: Thu Dec 16, 2021 10:26 amOut of interest, would there be any way of calculating this? Having a unit number attached to the cost would be handy to have as a rough guide for scale.
Diesel generators put out carbon monoxide as well as carbon dioxide. Those filters had better be miracle workers because otherwise spending an extended amount of time in that greenhouse you'd be putting yourself at risk. Industrial use can automate a lot of things. Things that humans would need to get in to do if you were doing it on a small scale.bishopdante wrote: Sat Dec 18, 2021 7:16 am
...They obviously do that on a massive Megawatts scale, but you could totally purchase a compact power generation unit designed for datacenter or telecommunications use, and run that into a suitable sized greenhouse growing... well... tomatoes. Dunno if you can get a cannabis growing license in Wisconsin, but I hear it's a cash crop that could fund a private space program (insert Highdeas here).
The Bladon micro-turbine https://www.bladonmt.com/bladon-micro-turbine-genset is a lovely little thing, and if you want a 2MW unit with a rotor assembly the size of a washing machine, I've got some experience... https://www.opraturbines.com/ both single stage radial turbines with a cantilevered structure, very much like a car turbocharger with a generator strapped to it.
You can also buy various turbines salvaged from the commercial aerospace industry, but they're not really designed for 24/7 reliable operation. Certainly piston engines are quite unsuitable for long-term low-noise/vibration high efficiency power generation, and the lack of effective and affordable small-scale turbine technology is one of the limits on off-grid urbanisation. Balancing the rotor is equivalent to precision, so it's possible to mass produce such things these days, whereas in the past it was horribly expensive to produce complex metal parts.
The core design advantage of a single stage radial turbine is that it's got just the one moving part: the spindle/rotor, so it's potentially cheap and reliable if you can solve the complexity and balance issues.
The fumes are probably going to get you messed up in the head faster than the potential crop ever could.bishopdante wrote: Sat Dec 18, 2021 7:16 am The system becomes extremely efficient if you
A: use the heat as well as the electrical power
B: use the CO2 to grow plants in a greenhouse (the CO2 will tend to be warm even if you do remove some of the heat, so a tropical environment in arctic conditions is quite achievable)
FYPbishopdante wrote: Sat Dec 18, 2021 7:16 am
The system becomes extremely efficient if you
A: Die from the fumes
B: Land yourself in jail for growing weed because this is Wisconsin we are talking about, not Cali.
Hello fellow nerds. "Not a Cult" sign out front sounds good.Johnny Doglands wrote: Sat Dec 18, 2021 1:03 pmDiesel generators put out carbon monoxide as well as carbon dioxide. Those filters had better be miracle workers because otherwise spending an extended amount of time in that greenhouse you'd be putting yourself at risk. Industrial use can automate a lot of things. Things that humans would need to get in to do if you were doing it on a small scale.bishopdante wrote: Sat Dec 18, 2021 7:16 am
...They obviously do that on a massive Megawatts scale, but you could totally purchase a compact power generation unit designed for datacenter or telecommunications use, and run that into a suitable sized greenhouse growing... well... tomatoes. Dunno if you can get a cannabis growing license in Wisconsin, but I hear it's a cash crop that could fund a private space program (insert Highdeas here).
The Bladon micro-turbine https://www.bladonmt.com/bladon-micro-turbine-genset is a lovely little thing, and if you want a 2MW unit with a rotor assembly the size of a washing machine, I've got some experience... https://www.opraturbines.com/ both single stage radial turbines with a cantilevered structure, very much like a car turbocharger with a generator strapped to it.
You can also buy various turbines salvaged from the commercial aerospace industry, but they're not really designed for 24/7 reliable operation. Certainly piston engines are quite unsuitable for long-term low-noise/vibration high efficiency power generation, and the lack of effective and affordable small-scale turbine technology is one of the limits on off-grid urbanisation. Balancing the rotor is equivalent to precision, so it's possible to mass produce such things these days, whereas in the past it was horribly expensive to produce complex metal parts.
The core design advantage of a single stage radial turbine is that it's got just the one moving part: the spindle/rotor, so it's potentially cheap and reliable if you can solve the complexity and balance issues.
I looked at that link. It's a marketing ploy when it says 'The MTG is EU Stage V equivalent and produces significantly less emissions than the new legislative requirements'. That thing would need to be putting out 40-50 times more energy than that for the Stage V rules to even apply. Legally, they have covered themselves with the links in the small print. It's exempt.
The fumes are probably going to get you messed up in the head faster than the potential crop ever could.bishopdante wrote: Sat Dec 18, 2021 7:16 am The system becomes extremely efficient if you
A: use the heat as well as the electrical power
B: use the CO2 to grow plants in a greenhouse (the CO2 will tend to be warm even if you do remove some of the heat, so a tropical environment in arctic conditions is quite achievable)
At least the corpse would be full of nutrition for the plants.
Return to “General Discussion”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest