Page 2 of 5
Re: Albums that have been edited to be more sensitive
Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2024 8:13 am
by enframed
A_Man_Who_Tries wrote: Sat Jun 29, 2024 6:52 am
I was hoping that
In Utero shout was a very dry comment on the final mix.
Same here.
Re: Albums that have been edited to be more sensitive
Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2024 8:15 am
by jfv
penningtron wrote: Sat Jun 29, 2024 6:14 am
Re:
In Utero: I think they only changed that song title for versions sold at Walmart.
It was definitely a thing back in the 90s. There is a long list of albums that could be mentioned here to which that applied, sometimes the songs themselves were edited too.
enframed wrote: Sat Jun 29, 2024 8:13 am
A_Man_Who_Tries wrote: Sat Jun 29, 2024 6:52 am
I was hoping that
In Utero shout was a very dry comment on the final mix.
Same here.
+1
Re: Albums that have been edited to be more sensitive
Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2024 9:55 am
by Lu Zwei
penningtron wrote: Sat Jun 29, 2024 6:14 am
The Jimmy Eat World album from 2001 was originally called
Bleed American, then 9/11 happened and they changed it to s/t.
Did not know that. They even changed the opening song:
1. "Bleed American" (listed as "Salt Sweat Sugar" on the self-titled version)
Dear lord, that sucked.
Re: Albums that have been edited to be more sensitive
Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2024 10:26 am
by zircona1
The Coup - Party Music (excellent album, btw)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Party_Music
Re: Albums that have been edited to be more sensitive
Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2024 10:34 am
by penningtron
Post 9/11 was a weird time. Changing a a meaningless album title because it might be
perceived as terrorism, totally normal stuff. I guess they went back to the original version for reissues.
I don't blame The Coup (Boots Riley's group) for later changing this album cover though, holy shit
(zircona1 just beat me to it)
Re: Albums that have been edited to be more sensitive
Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2024 11:32 am
by rsmurphy
I wish I still owned this one
I still own this one
Re: Albums that have been edited to be more sensitive
Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2024 12:10 pm
by tallchris
Generally I don't think a record label gets it right when it tries to tell a band what to do, but I think we can all say that Columbia (then distributing Def Jam) made the right call on the original title for License To Ill.
Re: Albums that have been edited to be more sensitive
Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2024 12:17 pm
by Lu Zwei
I got a nod from a respectful source that the opening song on the first Shellac record should have been called "My Black Bass" as a nod to Bob and his playing prudence.
So there you have it!
Re: Albums that have been edited to be more sensitive
Posted: Sun Jun 30, 2024 7:38 am
by ErickC
The reissues of Killing Is My Business... And Business Is good! come to mind.
Re: Albums that have been edited to be more sensitive
Posted: Sun Jun 30, 2024 11:32 am
by zircona1
Thought of another one: Cannibal Corpse. They've had a few album covers that were revamped (Vile, Tomb of the Mutilated, possibly more).