Tree wrote:Taste the happy, Michael!

it tastes like sad.

LAME.

Mainly, I can't stand Buster, who has got to be the most irritating character on a TV show ever. I'm struggling to make it through this first season.

None of the actors really help carry the show all that well. Jeffrey Tambor, a good actor, was so much better on The Larry Sanders show.

Jason Bateman is just too dull to make it work.

The so-called comedy is based on little bits, like the fact the kid is named George Michael, or David Cross' constant struggle to be funny. Eh.

this show is funny, if you don't find the hilarious dialogue of miscommunication funny...you won't like this show.

not crap.

Keep on forging ahead, at least a little bit longer. The jokes build on one another, making later season potentially more amusing than the first.

The character interactions can be a bit formulaic though.

unarmedman wrote:Keep on forging ahead, at least a little bit longer. The jokes build on one another, making later season potentially more amusing than the first.

The character interactions can be a bit formulaic though.

they can be formulaic, but the jokes made always deliver. always. this was one of the funniest shows.

One of my favourite shows ever. Just re-watched the last 8 episodes of season one yesterday, and noticed a lot of jokes I missed the first time round. I've just ordered the next two seasons from Amazon.

Great news about the planned film, too.

NC

Not Crap simply for the "Fuck City" line.

Not crap, but watching it for extended periods of time gave me the sensation of gears stripping:Some of the jokes were funny, but they didn't connect with me enough for the amount of times they were used.

At it's best it's hilarious and at its worst it's repetitive.

you can get, uh, what's that guys name? ...bob loblaw? yeahhh, bob loblaw, bob loblaw...

Best sit-com ever.