rocker654 wrote:Lennon and McCartney brought the best out in each other.
On their own, they produced some great stuff and some crap.
Lennon was an intellectual and McCartney was an entertainer.
Wings sold more records than the Beatles did.
McCartney=Not Crap most of the time.
Wings didn’t sell more records than the Beatles.
And if Lennon was anything, he was a pseudo-intellectual. They all were. I say this as a Lennon admirer. He was a doer, not a thinker. In the studio, he could care less about how things worked. He liked to perform in the moment. He was a big fan of that scream therapy stuff that he got from Yoko. Lennon loved jumping in to new philosophies, but he was never a master of them – more of a student.
Back in the Beatles days McCartney introduced tape loops to John. Macca went to galleries and stuff. He knew the names of painters. Pretty much all of the construct of the “theme-y” albums like Sgt. Pepper and Abbey Road are because of Paul (and George Martin). I think he was thought of as the intellectual more than any of the others.
I would say John was just as much an entertainer. He loved Chuck Berry. He rocked out more.