Gramsci wrote:What you seem to be missing is that they aren't drinking for the "alcohol effect", they are drinking for taste.
[...]
You seem to only look at drinking an alcoholic drink for the purpose of the intoxicating effects.
i don't 'seem' anything
for health purposes, alcohol is what it is. you said:
Not really, there is nothing more healthy about not drinking. It all depends on what you define as drinking.
you can define it however you want, but consumption of alcohol has a tiny window, within the bounds of great moderation, where it is a wash for most people or may have slight health benefits
beyond that, drinking is not as good for one's health as not drinking
my point is that healthfulness of consumption is related to quantity directly. one's intent is meaningless.
the balance between healthfulness and pleasure is one everyone must determine for himself, and i'm not interested in getting into that in any more detail than i already have
i don't know if you are suggesting that aficionados of alcoholic beverages are _exclusive_ to europe, exactly, but anyway, i know many american wine snobs and even more bourbon snobs and yet more beer snobs. however...
I think the European way of drinking falls a little flat on most Americans and the English because they have very little in the way of a culture of food, certainly not in the same way as Italians or the Spanish.
no argument there
although you are discounting british beer and spirits by implication, which as i recall isn't necessarily warranted in a broad sense