Dr. Venkman wrote:beloveless wrote:
My reason for starting this thread was that just like some folks have trouble reading me I have trouble reading them as well ( communication can be difficult when conversational language is used without the beneficial cues of inflection or body language and "smiley's" don't really do the trick).
So, let me get it straight. When you call someone a "faggot" or say that the basketball team were "indeed nappy-headed" and some of them are most likely "Ho's", It's the lack of proper smileys that makes you so misunderstood. If you just had the right smiley selection, you would be so much less of a douche, right?
Blow me, you fake.
Yes. the sound of my voice and my mannerisms are an important part of communication and No the correct smiley would not help as was my point.
I am not a douchebag I am an asshole. An asshole talks a little louder than he should and is either unaware of or indifferent to offending someones sensibilities but does not deliberately hurt someones feelings unless properly provoked. A douchebag is usually a quiet sort who just gives you the ickies when in their presence AND a douchebag knowingly does shitty things to other people.
I have never seriously referred to anyone as a faggot unless I have empirical knowledge of their homosexuality in combination with a crippling and psychotic flamboyancy ( pretty much anyone who may in groups of like minded others refer to themselves as a faggot)..my use of "faggot" in any post is harsh jest.
The women on the basketball team absolutely DO have nappy hair and i would take odds that at least a couple of them were promiscuous sluts (not that I take any issue with that) just from the idea that if you randomly sampled ten or so women or ten or so anything you will probably end up with a couple of "ho's" in the bunch. No malice intended just some folks are too easily offended by language.
So uh.. Fuck you , Faggot. Your a thing to be burned.
Now see here is where it gets sticky and I feel that I have to over explain my self. The "Fuck you" is totally real for calling me a douchebag since you properly provoked me (cause' I'm an Asshole, Remember ?) but the "Faggot" isn't real because I have no clue as to whether you are a Faggot or not AND it's a call back (thats an old Comedy term, Son ) to the previous "faggot" reference. NOW, the "you are a thing to be burned" Is there to REALLY put the whole "Faggot" thing over the top but also at the same time it is the literal meaning of the word "faggot" and just by defining it we see how ridiculous it is to call ANYONE a faggot because I have no idea whether or not you may well indeed be a Thing to be burned.
It's complicated, it's hard to communicate this way
