Earwicker wrote:

big_dave wrote:Can't talk, deformed jaw.

FYP

big_dave wrote:Rick has used plenty of racist terminology and has defended apparently racist positions. I wasn't wrong, you're still being a cunt.

Are you sure you want to go there again Dave?

You might get all flustered again and start pleading for the discussion to stop.
You just said you don't think Bob is a racist - I argued with you before for that precise reason.
You have admitted you were wrong.
I said it was big of you and now you've done gone and ruined it all by getting a 12 year olds blubbery lip on.

Oh well. You're a dick head so I shouldn't expect more really.


links please

big_dave wrote:Your use of a sarcastic emoticon really taught me a lot about maturity.

Heh dave, you can be as immature as you like I don't care.
I will reserve the right to be.
Our spats often amuse me - especially when you start getting all hot and bothered about them cause you run out of things to say.


I'd suggest you didn't send PMs to folk pleading with them to allow you to be mature though.

That's just - sort of - sad really.

You are one hell of a blowhard. I think you're the only person I've ever known to count a request to stop being so cringeworthy as a personal victory.

I PMed you because I saw no need for both of us to post drivel in threads, over and over. There is nothing personal, so why bother? If trying to establish a direct contact rather than message-board theatre/chestbeating is sad, I don't want to be happy.

I don't get "hot and bothered", I get embarressed when I see grown men like yourself sharpen their spears for personal grudges that aren't there. On the internet.

If you're dimwitted enough to see a bunch of swears and yuk-yuks at the expense of rightist/racist conspiracy theorists as a personal attack against you and your sensibilities, ain't big_dave's problem. If you're still fretting about this to mention it another time, feel free to shit yourself in front of an oncoming train.

If you don't find the terms "pro-semetic" and "bloodlines" to be racially charged, please proceed directly to your nearest primary school history lesson.

big_dave wrote:If you don't find the terms "pro-semetic" and "bloodlines" to be racially charged, please proceed directly to your nearest primary school history lesson.

How in the world can 'pro-semitic' be a racist term? If the term 'anti-semitic' exists, than that establishes that there is a median attitude towards semites that anti-semites are accused of falling below. A median position establishes both 'anti-semitic' and 'pro-semitic' neignborhoods of thought. Do you think there are white supremacists? Black supremacists? Funny blind spot you have.

See how the equator divides the hemispheres? It's sort of like that.


Still waiting for you to explain why 'bloodlines' is racist. I think this is the fourth time you have failed.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/familyhistory/bloodlines/

BBC wrote:Take an exciting and rewarding journey into your own past with 'Bloodlines', an easy-to-use tool for delving into four fascinating areas of your family history.

http://www.pbs.org/bloodlines/

The Human Genome Project (HGP) was an international scientific research project with a primary goal to determine the sequence of chemical base pairs which make up DNA and to identify the approximately 25,000 genes of the human genome from both a physical and functional standpoint.

The project's roots grew from early work on the inheritance of traits, such as those in plants. While the objective of the Human Genome Project is to understand the genetic makeup of the human species, the project also has focused on several other nonhuman organisms such as E. coli, the fruit fly, and the laboratory mouse. It remains one of the largest investigational projects in modern science.

Calm down, Bob.

Learn what the big words mean, and we'll chat.

big_dave wrote:I PMed you because I saw no need for both of us to post drivel in threads, over and over.

Drivel like calling someone a 'shitting cunt' on the strength of one fairly level headed post you mean?

big_dave wrote:There is nothing personal, so why bother?

er - you were the one who established the personal (private) message cock cheese.

big_dave wrote:I don't get "hot and bothered"

title of Dave's private message:

'look man this is starting creep me out'

that suggests to me 'hot and bothered' - not 'I'm embarrassed for you'

but you tell yourself what you want to get you through the day, debt boy

big_dave wrote:If you don't find the terms "pro-semetic" and "bloodlines" to be racially charged, please proceed directly to your nearest primary school history lesson.

take it to the BBC big fella -

- and look up the spelling for the word 'semitic' while you're at it.

carry on

big_dave wrote:I PMed you because I saw no need for both of us to post drivel in threads, over and over.

You post drivel, in an effort to ruin the threads you don't want people to read. Your fondest wish is that your drivel is reciprocated, to pollute the thread. When someone like Earwicker examines the content of the threads that you don't want people to read, you add insults to the drivel. Why would anyone expect you to honor an agreement to end a flame war? You will break the truce soon after, by resorting to new drivel and new insults as soon as new subject matter appears that you don't want discussed. The power to end your drivel lies within you. It requires no 'agreement'. What a laugh. The troll who starts the disruptions goes looking for a ceasefire. Talk about operating with short-term memory loss, Dave.

Nothing worse than a troll who resorts to fake offers of truces in PM's, and then wonders why his offers were rightfully met with skepticism. Your current and past behavior explains why you have no credibility to bargain with.

Two barely educated conspiracy theory geeks on the internet get rock-ons by tag-teaming someone who asked them if they'd mind being friendlier and posting less righteous, confrontional crap. Front page news.

I like how you find personal, confidential contact to be offensive - everything has to be down out her where dozens of strangers can read it before you consider it civil.

Cram it, retards.

big_dave wrote:Two barely educated conspiracy theory geeks on the internet get rock-ons by tag-teaming someone who asked them if they'd mind being friendlier and posting less righteous, confrontional crap.

Or alternatively - cock end debt supplier posts insulting comments then privately asks target of insults to not respond.
When said target asks for a retraction of said insult said target gets a lot of 'maturity' thrown back at him.

big_dave wrote:I like how you find personal, confidential contact to be offensive -

I don't find it offensive at all.
Privately you were civil, I asked you to extend that to the public forum and you got all shirty.
That's because you're a cock wart.

I can post the exchange if you'd like me to?

big_dave wrote:everything has to be down out her where dozens of strangers can read it before you consider it civil.

this makes no sense whatsoever.

Is it another joke I don't get or are you just getting all flustered again?

Whatever you want to believe, boss. Flustered, whatever.

Here was my PM, if you're too much of a puss to post it. Even if you fantasise about people caring.

I'll shut up if you shut up. I've asked Rick, I get bullshit back.

I won't reply to you, if you do the same. There's obviously crossed wires, and to be honest personal attacks on the internet are best kept for 16 years olds in Warcraft chatrooms.

The amount of time being spent bullying people on the internet should earn kicks in the bollocks, it is true.

and my reply:

Never shy of taking the opportunity to be righteous, eh? How butthurt can one person possibly be about gags on the internet

How about we both agree to shut up, and people won't have to read two adults acting like twelve year olds? That sound reasonable?

To which there was no forthcoming private reply, just a lot of remedial blurting for the audience.

For the record, I have never directly called Rick racist. I said he defended racist positions and used racially charged language. I have repeated this numerous times, and for all the time you two waste spazzing out over it you do not seem to read the posts where I say that.

Now now, mr calm debt boy

Here’s a more rigorous detail of our polite exchange:

You post this publicly:

big_dave wrote:Jesus fucking Christ, how about "if you arseholes don't like what I post, don't read it?"

Does that gambit work for anyone who isn't totally insane and washed up?

Earwicker wrote:oh - and I don't work for a credit agency

Neither do I. But then again, I don't show pornographic movies to Boy Scouts or whatever you do for a living. Nice to know that you're arroused by the fact stangers on the internet might take jobs they dislike to pay the bills.

I don't know what this means.

Are you autistic?

(totally unflustered post apparently)

Here’s the PM:

big_dave wrote:Look man this is creeping me out

I'll shut up if you shut up. I've asked Rick, I get bullshit back.

I won't reply to you, if you do the same. There's obviously crossed wires, and to be honest personal attacks on the internet are best kept for 16 years olds in Warcraft chatrooms. (This from the man introducing himself to someone by describing them as a ‘shitting cunt’ )

The amount of time being spent bullying people on the internet should earn kicks in the bollocks, it is true.

What a hypocritical cunt.

Here’s my response:

Earwicker wrote:Dave you can't just make a post openly insulting someone and accusing them (even in jest) of paedophilia then send a PM asking them not to respond.

I think you should look back and see where the insulting started (in this thread)(the nontheist one for anyone remotely interested).
I made a request on account of the fact you're accusing someone of racism and my thinking you're wrong.

All I was asking for was some evidence and I immediately get a 'fuck you' amongst other things. This isn't the first time either

I'd still like to see the quotes you're on about but I'll happily not respond if you just add a post saying you shouldn't have said some of those things.

I'd also appreciate it if you'd stop referring to me as if I was in some kind of gang with Rick and Skronk.

I'm not.

Here’s the totally unflustered response:

big_dave wrote:Never shy of taking the opportunity to be righteous, eh? How butthurt can one person possibly be about gags on the internet

How about we both agree to shut up, and people won't have to read two adults acting like twelve year olds? That sound reasonable?

Cue me thinking ‘fuck this cunt’



I’ll let folks make up their own minds - debt boy.

you can start being mature anytime you like.

Cue you still acting like a twelve year old. Do you have any idea about how painfully cringeworthy that crap is to read?

Yes, being dogged on the internet by someone like you does "creep me out". How much time do you want to spend on me? You are being creepy, seedy even.

Did I mention that I have a part time job at a bank?