pwalshj wrote:Ace wrote:But then I think about nearly all of the baby boomers I know and am completely disgusted by the fact that they once looked upon Mick Jagger as a real 'artist'.
Mick Jagger is a fucking asshole. Any real Stones fan will tell you this without batting an eyelash.
If I cared one iota whether anyone whose music I like was or is an asshole, I'd have to get rid of at least half of my record collection.
So what if someone is an egotistic, strutting, preening, self aggrandizing, stroke themselves while watching themselves in the mirror asshole?
Any medium of expression which encourages you to delve into your less than rational aspects of your thinking, which perhaps express your core, primitive, modes of thought and feeling, will also encourage you to unleash the less palatable aspects of your personality.
Do I have to deal with them on a personal level: no. If I did, I might have a different perspective on the people in the bands I like, on a personal level, but that doesn't mean I automatically dismiss everything they've done. It also doesn't mean I put them on some pedestal as objects to be admired either.
I like the Stones, a lot. Their output in the last 20-30 years; not so much. In fact, I own nothing after, I think, "Some Girls", which I am not really enthralled with. Prior to that, they created much to be admired.
