^enframed, sorry to hear the rotten news.
penningtron wrote:
I have a few friends who have gone tubeless within the last year. I haven't made up my mind about them yet: while they do seem to get less day to day flats, it still happens sometimes (deep potholes or train track grooves and whatnot) and I don't believe it's something that can be re-sealed on the spot. I think they perform better with less PSI which is counterintuitive compared to conventional road tires.
My wife's gravel bike had tubeless 28cs that failed completely a couple of times, and we found them infuriating to work with. We probably could've got comfortable with them had we invested time and effort in learning how to maintain and fix them, but we found them messy and fiddly, and nowhere near as reliable as we expected them to be. Tyre pressure may have been too high at times, perhaps. Speaking to a local bike store that specialised in mbks, I gather 28c is as thin a tubeless tyre can go without becoming a liability for anyone other than a pro, so if you're riding thicker wheels, go for it. We're sticking to clinchers hereon: the last failure ruined a ride and resulted in a costly taxi ride home, as the tyre was completely unseated.
Back in the UK, we rode old steel racing bikes ("classic lightweights" to use English terminology) with friends who are thoroughly in love with old bikes, and there are a fair few ex-racers in the bunch who stick to tubulars, which I saluted while thinking they're nuts.