steve wrote:alex maiolo wrote:steve wrote:Douchebags...
...douchebags
But aren't there much worse douchebags in the world? Record labels themselves, even many of the so-called independents?
I guess you just need to decide where our douche threshhold ought to lie.
I'm still deciding whether or not I would go see a band called Douche Threshold.
While I'm chewing on that I'll say that each person should decide where their DT is. We do that every day.
For me:
Wal Mart - never
Domino's Pizza - never
CostCo - only when I have no other option, but they are no Wal Mart
Starbucks - if there's no local roaster I have no probem with it at all.
Isn't there a difference between you (for example) wanting to release music on the Starbucks label and it being pretty indisputable that it's a shitty move across the board? Meaning a Wal Mart label release would be a shitty move in all of our eyes, I think. You mentioned that you will buy a cup of Starbucks from time to time, so you seem to not mind them as a company, so why is it bad for SY, to align with them? I don't think "traditional models" is a good reason and I doubt you'd give that as one.
There's a difference between being on the Halliburton label and selling your record at Starbucks, right? And if the latter is not the worst thing in the world, even if not all bands would want to do it, then why would it merrit a "Fuck Sonic Youth for doing that" response, which is what this thread is about. That's pretty extreme and I think it's best left for the more evil corporations.
Can you make a list for me, because on my list I put Starbucks on the side of where I don't want them releasing my band's records, and I think it's pretty gross for any band to do so.
Your
"trench of shit" essay literally changed the way I thought about the industry overnight. It prompted me get involved in music related causes instantly. I like your music a lot, but it's had almost no influence on how I play guitar. The essay, on the other hand, kicked me in the ass and got me involved.
Of the many things I took from it, "there are other ways to get your music out" was one of them. I certainly wouldn't say Starbucks is the answer, but it's
an answer if band x feels OK about it. The deal is a hell of a lot sweeter than any major record contract that I know of, and it represents a way to give labels which have traditionally acted in bad faith the cold shoulder. These new deals tend to be a lot more fair for the artist than the traditional (there's that word again) recoupables/payola/points/blah blah model.
There's no way I could make a list for you, or anyone else. All I'm saying is the music community should probably concentrate it's resources on calling out the really evil entities instead of sending a "fuck you" letter to a band that's been a pretty positive force in music, just because they did this unconventional deal with a company many of us, you included, aren't so offended by that we withold our patronage from them.
-A
Itchy McGoo wrote:I would like to be a "shoop-shoop" girl in whatever band Alex Maiolo is in.