Ha ha, no, I meant that I'm not questioning that he's important to Pop/Rock, nor that he can probably do a mean turn on the bass, and I'll accept that he's got a ton of tunes under his man-made materials belt.space junk wrote:So your argument, such as it is, is that you don't want to enter into a discourse about Paul McCartney's importance in pop, his musical ability, or his electric bass playing. What criteria are you judging the bastard on? His choice in footwear? His height?
My arguments were, again:
1. Your argument, or at least it's presentation, was poor;
2. I think Paul McCartney is crap.
Unlike your good self, I do not extend [2] to being "anyone who disagrees with me is a prick", although that's a line of reasoning that I'm starting to consider
*thumbs aloft pose*
Got me?
for the record, he's 5'11" , pretty tall for rock's oldest pixie. So, whilst I can still look down on him, I've got no real chance for mockery there.