C mon Favre! Pull it together!

172
DrAwkward wrote:The early forecast for next Sunday is a gametime temperature of 7 degrees.

Did somebody mention "7"?

Image


iembalm wrote:[Y]ou don't have to look far in Wisconsin to find a Packer shareholder.

The history of the Green Bay Packers stock is interesting to me.

"Based on the original 'Articles of Incorporation for the (then) Green Bay Football Corporation' put into place in 1923, if the Packers franchise was sold, after the payment of all expenses, any remaining funds would go to the Sullivan-Wallen Post of the American Legion in order to build "a proper soldier's memorial." This stipulation was enacted to ensure that the club remained in Green Bay and that there could never be any financial enhancement for the shareholder. The beneficiary was changed from the Sullivan-Wallen Post to the Green Bay Packers Foundation on the basis of a shareholder vote at the November 1997 meeting."

Mandroid2.0 from Alameda CA wrote:I guess, in that Brown County pays for the the new stadium well after they should with their increased sales tax [...], we are a collective involved in the Packers business. So "we" are supposedly a "team." The Pack is important to our economy, right?

Given your extreme distaste for taxpayer contributions to sports franchises, it makes perfect sense that you would move to Alameda.

C mon Favre! Pull it together!

173
Bradley R. Weissenberger wrote:
DrAwkward wrote:The early forecast for next Sunday is a gametime temperature of 7 degrees.

Did somebody mention "7"?

Image


iembalm wrote:[Y]ou don't have to look far in Wisconsin to find a Packer shareholder.

The history of the Green Bay Packers stock is interesting to me.

"Based on the original 'Articles of Incorporation for the (then) Green Bay Football Corporation' put into place in 1923, if the Packers franchise was sold, after the payment of all expenses, any remaining funds would go to the Sullivan-Wallen Post of the American Legion in order to build "a proper soldier's memorial." This stipulation was enacted to ensure that the club remained in Green Bay and that there could never be any financial enhancement for the shareholder. The beneficiary was changed from the Sullivan-Wallen Post to the Green Bay Packers Foundation on the basis of a shareholder vote at the November 1997 meeting."

Mandroid2.0 from Alameda CA wrote:I guess, in that Brown County pays for the the new stadium well after they should with their increased sales tax [...], we are a collective involved in the Packers business. So "we" are supposedly a "team." The Pack is important to our economy, right?

Given your extreme distaste for taxpayer contributions to sports franchises, it makes perfect sense that you would move to Alameda.



I am a shareholder (so is my father as we just bought each other stock one year for X-mas) I never/very rarely refer to the Packers as "we" or "us".
Ty Webb wrote:
You need to stop pretending that this is some kind of philosophical choice not to procreate and just admit you don't wear pants to the dentist.

C mon Favre! Pull it together!

180
Dr. O' Nothing wrote:Goddammit i want to watch this game something fierce but i'm in Buenos Aires and Fox does not transmit their sporting events down here. I get the AFC, but not the NFC games.
Anyone know a way around this with the use of a Macintosh computer?



there is someone I know who watches packer games from China, let me see how he does it, and get back to you...
Ty Webb wrote:
You need to stop pretending that this is some kind of philosophical choice not to procreate and just admit you don't wear pants to the dentist.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 397 guests