Stabby Cat wrote:

jlamour wrote:Until this happens, lay off the FASCIST economic regulation. Let individuals decide what is beneficial for themselves. If they violate someone else's property, punish them.

wouLdN't pUnisHINg JusT be FasCist, AspHalt Hugger?

aNd

LMAO! Love the pic. Maybe to an anarchist? Punishment is simply enforcing justice. Or am I way off with this claim? Do I need to substantiate this?

I'm always open to finding/listening to a reasonable answer to any question.

This has been exhibited to be untrue in nearly every post of yours on this subject.

Happiness is freedom from my fellow man.

Then go the fuck away.

Freedom from him using the government to force me to bow to him and his will.

Says the namby pamby self-assured user of big words to express non-ideas. Pitiful idiots like you would last about 30 seconds in the world you're begging for.

jlamour wrote:Again with the labels and name calling?

For someone whose first post in this thread called someone a "fucking psycho" and whose second post in this thread called someone else "you hypocrite," you certainly do complain about name-calling a lot.

Drawing a fat line between the idea of rights and morality is the mark of pure douchbaggery.

bigc wrote:

I'm always open to finding/listening to a reasonable answer to any question.

This has been exhibited to be untrue in nearly every post of yours on this subject.

How so?

bigc wrote:

Happiness is freedom from my fellow man.

Then go the fuck away.

Beautiful. Busted you on context dropping. Consider yourself typical. If this is over your head, ignore.

bigc wrote:

Freedom from him using the government to force me to bow to him and his will.

Says the namby pamby self-assured user of big words to express non-ideas. Pitiful idiots like you would last about 30 seconds in the world you're begging for.

I'm not begging for anything. This system does exist to a large degree already and I'm doing quite well. I could be doing even better if there were a few improvements.

oxlongm wrote:

jlamour wrote:Again with the labels and name calling?

For someone whose first post in this thread called someone a "fucking psycho" and whose second post in this thread called someone else "you hypocrite," you certainly do complain about name-calling a lot.

I believe I called Blanchett a "fucking psycho" and the hypocrite a "hypocrite" because all he did was make a bullshit claim that what I wrote was bullshit which, of course, wasn't as I eloquently demonstrated in my subsequent posts.

jlamour wrote:

bigc wrote:

I'm always open to finding/listening to a reasonable answer to any question.

This has been exhibited to be untrue in nearly every post of yours on this subject.

How so?

bigc wrote:

Happiness is freedom from my fellow man.

Then go the fuck away.

Beautiful. Busted you on context dropping. Consider yourself typical. If this is over your head, ignore.

bigc wrote:

Freedom from him using the government to force me to bow to him and his will.

Says the namby pamby self-assured user of big words to express non-ideas. Pitiful idiots like you would last about 30 seconds in the world you're begging for.

I'm not begging for anything. This system does exist to a large degree already and I'm doing quite well. I could be doing even better if there were a few improvements.

Your fallacy ridden non-logic is soooo beyond me. I just don't 'get you' man!

I'll be content to sit back and watch everyone else, who isn't as easily irritated by dumbfucks like you, make you look like a complete dumbfuck...even more.

bigc wrote:Your fallacy ridden non-logic is soooo beyond me. I just don't 'get you' man!

I'll be content to sit back and watch everyone else, who isn't as easily irritated by dumbfucks like you, make you look like a complete dumbfuck...even more.

Dumbfuck? I can handle. That exposes your maturity. Fallacy ridden non-logic? That's harsh but it's hard to take this judgment seriously after the dumbfuck statement.

I just wanted a discussion on a major current issue. I know I haven't answered every question or countered every point, only for the sake of time, but I believe I've answered most things in a clear manner. I'm not into simply providing concrete examples (which I have actually done in this thread, I guess we need to work on our reading comprehension skills) because then people start countering with their own hand-picked concretes and it distracts from the discussion on the ideas themselves.

Please reject the nihilist philosophy that ideas are just floating abstractions with no 'actual' worldly applications or consequences. This is a fundamental tenet that nationalist and religious fascists love to preach in order to get you to forfeit your mind and body.

A few people did attack my ideas and made it interesting. If that's all that happened, this thread would have been maybe 3 pages long and a lot more entertaining, I promise. But it is a forum.

what if I step in and offer to wash her hair for her?
I'll spray the poon as well, if that's still an issue

Marsupialized wrote:what if I step in and offer to wash her hair for her?
I'll spray the poon as well, if that's still an issue

She'd probably accept but only if you insisted on using your own 'man shampoo'.