My allegiance lies with:

Fugazi
Total votes: 125 (49%)
The Jesus Lizard
Total votes: 131 (51%)
Total votes: 256

Ultimate Thunderdome: Fugazi vs. The Jesus Lizard

171
Get dog costumes wrote:Overall, it's apples and oranges, but Brendan's much more versatile and a better drummer.


Objectively incorrect. If you think Mac's only appeal is that he hits hard, you're crazy. He's way more experimental than Brendan and came up with far weirder parts than Brendan ever played. Listen to "Mistletoe" or "Perk" or "Din" or "Good Thing" if you doubt this.

Brendan's a solid drummer, but Mac is the consummate musician behind a kit. It's like comparing Guy's guitar playing with Duane's. Guy came up with some interesting stuff, but Duane wrote the sort of really intricate and nuanced progressions that only a maestro could come up with.
Gay People Rock

Ultimate Thunderdome: Fugazi vs. The Jesus Lizard

172
Maybe its just because its the music I grew up with, but I have to say Fugazi by a mile.

I can't comment on how the live shows are. Missed my only chance to see Fugazi and didn't start to like the Jesus Lizard until they were no more.

In the end, I only like a couple of Jesus Lizard records (Goat and Liar), but I still listen to and love every Fugazi record. (The Argument included)

Plus, I enjoy every band that members of Fugazi have been in while the only thing connected with the Jesus Lizard that I enjoy is Rapeman.

Ultimate Thunderdome: Fugazi vs. The Jesus Lizard

173
NerblyBear wrote:
Get dog costumes wrote:Overall, it's apples and oranges, but Brendan's much more versatile and a better drummer.


Objectively incorrect. If you think Mac's only appeal is that he hits hard, you're crazy. He's way more experimental than Brendan and came up with far weirder parts than Brendan ever played. Listen to "Mistletoe" or "Perk" or "Din" or "Good Thing" if you doubt this.

Of course that's not his only appeal. He's solid, has good parts, and plays with restraint. He might be a "consummate musician" in TJL, but he'd never play "Bad Mouth" or "Bulldog Front" or "Repeater" as well as Brendan.

I didn't know he was a maestro, though. When I take that into account, I have to concede this argument.
chrysler wrote:The home page says "Welcome!", but the message board sometimes does not.

Ultimate Thunderdome: Fugazi vs. The Jesus Lizard

174
NerblyBear wrote:
Get dog costumes wrote:Overall, it's apples and oranges, but Brendan's much more versatile and a better drummer.


Objectively incorrect. If you think Mac's only appeal is that he hits hard, you're crazy. He's way more experimental than Brendan and came up with far weirder parts than Brendan ever played. Listen to "Mistletoe" or "Perk" or "Din" or "Good Thing" if you doubt this.

Brendan's a solid drummer, but Mac is the consummate musician behind a kit. It's like comparing Guy's guitar playing with Duane's. Guy came up with some interesting stuff, but Duane wrote the sort of really intricate and nuanced progressions that only a maestro could come up with.


exactly.
buy my guitar. now with pictures!

Ultimate Thunderdome: Fugazi vs. The Jesus Lizard

175
that damned fly wrote:
Marsupialized wrote:You are nuts. They were great till the very last show.


yes, they were. if you subtract out "the argument" songs and substitute them with songs from the three previous albums. then yes, they very well would have been great 'til the last show. not how it happened though.

i saw them 7x. first show in '99, last show in '04 (possibly '03, i forget) either way, once the argument came out, they had joe sing "the kill" instead of doing "by you" or "recap modotti" which are both far superior songs. especially "by you" when done live. immense is a good word for a live "by you." any performance of "the kill" is at best tedious.

this trend followed once "the argument" came out. better songs were substituted for newer, lesser songs. most of which at best were tedious. and as i said, once "the argument" came out, you were going to hear almost every track of that album at the show. most of which were subpar fugazi songs and successfully killed any momentum they built up everytime it went to a weak "argument" song. take that into account happening several times within a three hour show. everytime that momentum is killed you realize how long you've been standing there. and how obnoxious it's getting to be to be standing there.

when you first saw fugazi, and if they were "on" that night, it was fresh. after awhile though, it seemed standard. right, the politics part. right, the asshole in the crowd part. maybe a funny story (hardly). maybe a unique moment (none come to mind). mostly though, the same old shit.

i've seen 7 TJL bootlegs (never saw 'em live). two were recorded on two consecutive ("down" era) nights. none of these are replaceable with any other. not the one i saw with james kimbal instead of mac, not that one show from dec of '94 in texas (where duane beats the guy up) with the very next show the following night. not the one where david yow get's pissed at the new jersey crowd in '93 (i think) and stomps and kicks all the beers sitting on the front of the stage, neither show from '91, one from DC (so much "goat" material!) and the one in NC from a few days earlier (they played "pop song!") none of these shows could be switched with any other.

a friend in town went on tour with them early on in their career and saw many TJL shows, and every time they passed through town afterwards he had the dilemma of "do i really want to see the jesus lizard again?...yeah, i do."

if it only boiled down to who has more solid albums? fugazi.
if only live shows were measured? in my mind, the jesus lizard. easy.
if band politics? fugazi.
if which band had the more monumental album? the jesus lizard.
if which band had more of a visceral impact? the jesus lizard.
musicianship? the jesus lizard. if you think joe and brendan have anything on dave and mac, and guy or ian seperate or together have anything on duane alone, or if guy or ian had anything on "frontmanship" against david, you would be all kinds of hilarious wrong.
more emotional content in songs: fugazi.
more fun: the jesus lizard


here's a fun way to measure: the pedigrees.

fugazi: the teen idles, minor threat, rites of spring, happy go licky, one last wish, the all scars, the black sea, the evens. (did i miss any?)

the jesus lizard: scratch acid, rapeman, mule (i think, right?), tomahawk, qui. (again, did i miss any?)

to me, it's not going to be the jesus lizard every situation, but it's going to be them most of the situations.

i didn't hear fugazi's last show, but i did hear several leading up to it. i did hear the jesus lizard's last show, it should have been released as "bang" because that's how they went out. find that bootleg.


....God above.
coffin or new guy

Ultimate Thunderdome: Fugazi vs. The Jesus Lizard

177
Get dog costumes wrote:
Ranxerox wrote:TJL were better players and their artistry (choice of cover art, for instance) was well beyond Fugazi.

This is ridiculous. "GOAT" in stencil and a nude woman and some flames is not even in the same league as Fugazi's collages, Washington monument, and cool two-piece packaging.



Uhh, why not compare Goat to any of the first three Fugazi releases, then move on to the other TJL releases. For instance, thought Down was not the band's strongest moment, it had cool art on it, as did Liar, a number of the 7" releases, etc. Collages were fine, but less interesting to me. Taste, I suppose. Likewise, TJL lyrics ruled over Fugazi's pedantic laments. In the end we are talking about taste where this particular issue is concerned (I think that TJL were objectively better players).

I will add that, if Fugazi played a one off in DC or Dallas (I live in Austin) or Chicago I would probably let it pass without a thought. If TJL played such a show in Tokyo I would try very hard to be there.

Ultimate Thunderdome: Fugazi vs. The Jesus Lizard

178
I saw The Jesus Lizard live three or four times. The first time they were absolutely incredible, but by the third or so time, I realized that they did the same exact schtick every show and it was very, very boring. In fact, the last time I saw them, the Jon Spencer Blues Explosion blew them off the stage -- and I don't even LIKE the Jon Spencer Blues Explosion!

However, I saw Fugazi twice and they sucked both times! I hate to say that about a band I love so much, but live they just meandered and dragged songs out forever with these stupid jams and it was a real drag.

So if I were going by live shows, I guess I'd pick the Jesus Lizard because, predictable or not, at least they played all their great songs tight and showed respect for their audiences. Fugazi seemed more about doing what they wanted to do, which is great and well-earned and all but didn't make for the most exciting shows - at least the two that I attended.

I only picked Fugazi by a hair, and that's due to the consistency of their material. I'm one of those folks who love "The Argument," so that's what's going on there I guess. I don't think the Jesus Lizard ever completely 'lost' it either; I just think they sorta ran out of energy by "Blue." A lot of the songs on there sound like songs they'd already recorded -- just with more studio effects.

Ultimate Thunderdome: Fugazi vs. The Jesus Lizard

179
that damned fly wrote:musicianship? the jesus lizard. if you think joe and brendan have anything on dave and mac, and guy or ian seperate or together have anything on duane alone, or if guy or ian had anything on "frontmanship" against david, you would be all kinds of hilarious wrong.


This is missing the whole point of what a rock band is about, to me. The interplay and arrangements in both bands were perfect, you couldn´t replace Lally´s or Brendan´s parts in Fugazi with anything played by someone of "greater musicianship" without sinking the songs completely. The two guitar / bass / drums relationship in Fugazi was impeccable, pretty much any of their songs is a testament to that (listen closely to "Foreman´s Dog", for one of countless examples). It was very much a case of the whole being greater than the sum of its parts, as is the case with any great band.

The single fact that TJL had only one guitar already makes them a totally different animal. The guitar duo of Ian and Guy is equal to any of the great ones in rock music, be it Lloyd and Verlaine, Ranaldo and Moore, Perry and Whitford, guys from MX-80 whose name I forget, you choose.

I mean, listen to anything Duane did after the Lizard (Tomahawk´s material is all his, isn´t it), what does that tell you?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests