joelb wrote:Anyway: your original comment suggested that if Wayne was not intentionally going after Dent, then a "crucial distinction" between Dent and Wayne is lost.
Well, maybe what matters then isn’t whether Wayne had chosen to make the sacrifice but that he was able to accept it. It’s not as clean an allusion to Abraham and Isaac, but it’s still pretty good. I’d be interested to see the movie again to pay closer attention to all the talk about “heroes” and “knights” because there’s a great deal of it.
joelb wrote:Going after Dent would have made Wayne Kierkegaard's knight of faith, which would place Dent in the true hero position. Which I don't buy. Now we can debate whether Dent was seeking the certain or motivated by a quest for redemption.
Ok. I think that Dent understands heroism but he doesn’t understand faith. He is exactly Kierkegaard’s definition of a tragic hero: someone who can make a sacrifice if he is fairly certain that the outcome will further his cause. Dent was able to turn himself over to the police because he knows he’d be keeping Batman in business. Kierkegaard describes the Greek king Agamemnon’s sacrifice of his daughter Iphighenia as an act of heroism and not an act of faith because Agamemnon had been guaranteed something in return: the propitiation of the goddess Artemis.
At one point Dent says something like, “You either die a hero or live long enough to become a villain”. He doesn’t really have faith. Faith is something you hold onto in the shittiest of shit… your girlfriend’s violent death, God telling you to kill your only son. Senseless terror, fear and trembling.
joelb wrote:I agree this is getting pretty thick for a comic book film.
Too late. But I really do think this is a pretty philosophically sophisticated film and that it’s ok to nerd on it a bit. Step inside my toolbox.
Ace wrote:derrida, man. like, profound.