Covers that are better than the original

183
IceManCometh wrote:
Bubber wrote:
IceManCometh wrote:I've always loved Tom Verlaine's "Kingdom Come," much better than Bowie's version.


(This is a Television tune--you like the original better than the cover.)


No wonder people have been looking at me so strangely over the years when I bring this up in heated argument. Thanks for the correction.


Sure! Thank *you* for not exploding at me for telling you!

Now I just have to see if Alex Maiolo turns uncharacteristically cranky when he discovers that the Jimmy Scott version of "Jealous Guy" is the best one. Cross your fingers.

Covers that are better than the original

184
Mark Hansen wrote:
matthias beebe wrote:the blues covers led zep did

and of course "just got paid" from two nuns and a pack mule, are some of my favorites.


What, the cover versions of old blues songs that Zep tarted up are better than the originals? :roll: :roll: :roll:

You don't get a pass on this just because you also picked a song that Rapeman covered.


no no no, i'm sorry i did not mean they were better than the originals. i appreciate and am in awe of original blues artists such as blind blake or charley jordan way more than led zeppelin. as i was typing i seem to have forgotten the premise of the thread. these are just some of my favorite covers.

that being said, i don't think 'tarted up' is a fair assessment either. led zep might have been a glam/pop band of sorts but they did their music justice IMO. you have to remember that a significant amount of the blues songs recorded in the 20's and 30's or before 'rock music' came along were in fact covers anyway, as they had existed and mutated for several decades as traditional songs passed from person to person, before recording technology was available.

arguably due to racist barriers it took middle class white kids and wealthy corporate record companies to bring these songs to the mainstream, and that's certainly lamentable, but i don't blame led zeppelin or like their music any less because of it.

Covers that are better than the original

189
Skronk wrote:
alex maiolo wrote:No, no.
Really, sorry to be diggin' around in your brain and stuff, but when I was in there I noticed that you really do like the Magazine version more.
FYI and all that.

McGeoch man! Seriously.

-A


I'm comparing them now. Yes, Ministry's version is better. Better sounding, hefty drums, more up front bass, the vocals, the guitar is more pronounced.

Howard Devoto ain't got nothing on Jourgensen on this one, even if he did write the song.


It's cool.
I know what you really meant to say.
*wink*

-A

(dude...McGeoch...)
Itchy McGoo wrote:I would like to be a "shoop-shoop" girl in whatever band Alex Maiolo is in.

Covers that are better than the original

190
Bubber wrote:
IceManCometh wrote:
Bubber wrote:
IceManCometh wrote:I've always loved Tom Verlaine's "Kingdom Come," much better than Bowie's version.


(This is a Television tune--you like the original better than the cover.)


No wonder people have been looking at me so strangely over the years when I bring this up in heated argument. Thanks for the correction.


Sure! Thank *you* for not exploding at me for telling you!

Now I just have to see if Alex Maiolo turns uncharacteristically cranky when he discovers that the Jimmy Scott version of "Jealous Guy" is the best one. Cross your fingers.


Nah, I agree for the most part.
On the subject of The Faces, I like their rambling version quite a lot too.
Lennon's is a little sappy and overdone. Perhaps he was still on his Spector love kick? I mean it's great, but just as Macca's Long and Winding Road sounds so much better without the dramatic crap, Lennon's Jealous Guy was sort of almost the top and could have used a stripping down.
That's where Jimmy Scott be all over it.

I'm just cranky about the Magazine thing.
Nobody fuck' wit' da McGeoch.

-A
Itchy McGoo wrote:I would like to be a "shoop-shoop" girl in whatever band Alex Maiolo is in.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests