Re: Politics

1842
Well, Trump was the favorite before this....I think many of us pessimists would guess that he'll continue to hold that advantage against a newcomer despite the initial enthusiasm for jettisoning the old fart. Good luck with whatever it is you're hoping will happen. I'm guessing it will be a long, long race to the bottom.

Re: Politics

1843
DaveA wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2024 2:25 pm
dumbass wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2024 1:57 pm its gonna be a blow out anyways...
In whose favor? You think Trump will run away with it?

Fine if people want to have a cynical take on things, especially politics at this level.

But I feel a lot more enthusiastic about this race today than I did before the announcement.

Lefties will temper their enthusiasm accordingly, if they have any at all, I guess. But I think there's something real at stake and this isn't "over."
I've seen zero enthusiasm for her online or irl, as I said mayor pete got more delegates than her in the primaries. I just don't see it happening, this is the only space I've seen anyone talking about her at all tbh

Re: Politics

1845
dumbass wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2024 1:57 pm the truth is no one is excited about zero delegate Kamala, I'll be sitting this one out, its gonna be a blow out anyways...
Negative. If you asked me last week if I wanted Kamala as a candidate I would've said the same thing. This week, watching Stephen Miller's head explode, I want 8 years of this. Petty, self serving, unrelated to the direction of the country.. yes, but Kamala for prez %100

Re: Politics

1846
dumbass wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2024 2:55 pmthis is the only space I've seen anyone talking about her at all tbh
You need to stretch out a bit more if EA is the only place you are receiving up-to-date news about the presidential race. So far her fundraising efforts tops $80m.

Zoom Call For WinWithBlackWomen Attracts 44,000 & Raises $1.5mil In 3 Hours
dumbass wrote:not to mention her record
And by stretching out a bit more I don't mean the Daily Wire.
Justice for Dexter Wade and Nakari Campbell

Re: Politics

1847
rsmurphy wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2024 3:23 pm
dumbass wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2024 2:55 pmthis is the only space I've seen anyone talking about her at all tbh
You need to stretch out a bit more if EA is the only place you are receiving up-to-date news about the presidential race. So far her fundraising efforts tops $80m.

Zoom Call For WinWithBlackWomen Attracts 44,000 & Raises $1.5mil In 3 Hours
dumbass wrote:not to mention her record
And by stretching out a bit more I don't mean the Daily Wire.
this was from the debates on msnbc sorry if you don't approve the messenger, I follow mostly dem socialists and progressives on bluesky and twitter, zero positive comments on kamala the cop

Re: Politics

1849
hbiden@onlyfans.com wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2024 3:33 pm
rsmurphy wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2024 3:23 pm
dumbass wrote:not to mention her record
And by stretching out a bit more I don't mean the Daily Wire.
You know tulsi was right though.
Via msnbc via Ben Shapiro via twitter….
Where’s the lie?
she 100% right, libs have to attack the messenger when they can't attack the message

Re: Politics

1850
hbiden@onlyfans.com wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2024 3:33 pm You know tulsi was right though.
Via msnbc via Ben Shapiro via twitter….
Where’s the lie?
No lie and I've spoken as such at length online and via my breath for years.
dumbass wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2024 3:39 pm she 100% right, libs have to attack the messenger when they can't attack the message
Don't call me a lib. I've donated to and marched with democratic socialists and the extreme left. Which behooves my point of calling you out giving clicks to Ben Shapiro instead of Claudia & Karina or Amanda Seales or black leftists or practically anyone else speaking truth and not Ben Shapiro. Make sense?
Justice for Dexter Wade and Nakari Campbell

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests