Brett Eugene Ralph wrote:Shotgun-Charlie wrote:I don't know how many other people here relied on Nirvana as a sort of "gateway" band, but I certainly did; without them I wouldn't have gotten into the Jesus Lizard, Melvins (the as always obvious connection) or even Fugazi.
I've heard versions of this argument a hundred times on this board, and it's time to dispense with this weak logic once and for all. Just because something constitutes the "gateway" to a bunch of good things, that doesn't necessarily make it a good thing in and of itself. The first "new wave" music I got into was The Cars; does it make them good simply because they indirectly led me to Die Kreuzen and Bad Brains? Hell, no. And while I've had many beautiful and satisfying sexual experiences, my "gateway" was boning some fat redneck chick in the woods down by the Ohio River. Should I go back and revise that experience now based on the mind-numbing sex that came after? Probably not--I was at the brink even as I slipped the condom on.
Look, I'm glad you got turned on to cool music, but there's no need, really, to romanticize the path you took in getting there. Just be glad you got there one way or another.
Oh yeah, I almost forgot: Fugazi.
My response was based off of the whole time-travel scenario: If I destroy one band, I don't experience the other. That was all. I wasn't testifying to either band's qualities. Maybe in the name of geek fun I took the time- travel/destruction thing as a literal part of the question.
In terms of who is the better band, well, I reckon it's probably been around a year since I last put on either one's record, so I can't really judge. [EDIT: Well, yes, I could judge and I'd more than likely say Nirvana, but I think the real answer to any and all questions should be Motorhead, and that's just because I've bee going through a pretty big Motorhead phase lately.]
Yep, I was really just being a big nerd answering a time-travel question.
Sorry for any confusion.